By late January, the New Year’s resolutions we had planned to start strong are now either our every-day motivation or a lost cause.  Here, at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP (“BCLP”), the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Team has stuck with its New Year’s resolution to lean into 2019 as a new and exciting year for autonomous aircraft innovations, regulation, and industry growth.

2018: A Year in Review

Autonomous aircraft—also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (“UAVs”), Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“UAS”) or simply “drones”—were the subject of much discussion last year.  Last year, Congress passed the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) Reauthorization Act of 2018 (the “Act”), continuing the FAA’s mission to comprehensively integrate drones into the national airspace;1 the FAA initiated a prototype Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability program (“LAANC”) that provides real-time airspace authorizations for drones near airports;2 and the FAA launched the UAS Integration Pilot Program (“UAS IPP”) to allow states to test drone flights in various ways otherwise prohibited by the FAA’s Part 107 rules—or the rules governing the operation of drones weighing less than 55 pounds.3

2019: Off to a Strong Start

This year, we may expect not only continued developments in drone law and regulation in response to a growing commercial drone market, but also more serious developments in response to evolving security concerns.

The New Year started strong with two pre-filed bills by Representative Clay Yarborough (FL) and Senator Darryl Rouson (FL), seeking access to drones for surveillance purposes on behalf of state law enforcement. 4  And, just last week, the Trump Administration’s Transportation Secretary, Elaine Chao, proposed new rules for the FAA’s integration of drones into the national airspace.5  “Drones . . . are well on their way to mainstream deployment,” Ms. Chao said during her speech in Washington, D.C.6  “[T]o reap the considerable economic benefits of this growing industry,” she said, “we’d like to share with you . . . new [Department of Transportation (“DOT”)] initiatives to encourage the safe testing and deployment of drones.”7   The first, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, presents rules allowing drones to operate over populated areas or to fly at night without needing special waivers from the FAA; such operation is conditioned on the drone operator meeting certain criteria for training, testing, and anti-collision lighting.8  Currently, night waivers are the most commonly granted waiver, often for commercial operators whose drones have thermal inspection capabilities.9

Flying over populated areas is another well sought-after waiver, as the ability to fly drones over people can be helpful for crowd control, newsgathering, and infrastructure inspections.10  Yet, flights over people can be risky, as seen last year when a drone inspecting the famously sinking Millennium Tower in San Francisco malfunctioned and plunged at pedestrians walking below.11  Thankfully, no pedestrians were struck.  The DOT’s proposed rules are designed to minimize risk to people on the ground by restricting the weight of eligible drones and requiring operators to design their drones in a way that will prevent serious injury to people.12

Ms. Chao also announced that the FAA will seek public comments on drone security issues and plans to further develop the UAS Traffic Management Pilot Project—a parallel to the FAA’s traditional air traffic management system but for drones—by having awarded new government contracts to vendors to continue the project.13

Such flurried activity in drone law and regulation is likely an attempt by policymakers to provide a more robust regulatory framework for the nearly 1.3 million drones and 116,000 operators registered in the United States.14  Thus far, a comprehensive and effective regulatory framework appears to be a top priority for legislators in 2019.

2019: What’s Next?

The DOT’s proposed rules may benefit companies like Amazon and Alphabet, Inc.—who are readying drone fleets for package deliveries once given the government clearance.15  Drones already provide tremendous benefits in areas such as law enforcement surveillance, disaster and humanitarian aid, scientific research, infrastructure maintenance, and news broadcasting.16 Recent developments in drone technology present further opportunities for a commercialized industry—whether seen in the first successful, test delivery of a kidney transplant or incredibly precise aerial assessments of construction projects.17  Companies are working to commercialize and deploy drones across various sectors and markets—with many start-ups dominating the field, Hyundai Motor Company announcing a new partnership in the field, and Boeing scheduling the first test flight of its solar-powered drone.18

Continued investment in and protection of the commercial drone market will likely maintain the industry’s upward trajectory.  A report from Goldman Sachs predicts that the total spending on drones worldwide will be over $100 billion by the year 2020.19  National defense remains the biggest spender in the drone market, with consumers coming in second.20  Vendors in the construction and agricultural markets are predicted to experience the largest growth due to specialty drone use.21  The global “counter-UAV market,” which references the industry that develops drone technology countermeasures, also expects growth estimated to reach $1.85 billion by 2024.22 

The FAA has only begun to revamp rules related to drone operations, still having left untouched the “beyond visual line of sight” waiver companies would often seek to expand their commercial operations.23  The agency also plans to propose another set of rules in May 2019 concerning the remote identification of drones.24  The rules would require small drones to broadcast their identity and position so authorities may track them; such regulations would lessen security concerns and likely reduce the need for drone countermeasures, if the tracking technology works as it should. 25  One of the remote identification systems being vetted is called “AUDS.”26  It could take longer than a year to finalize the proposed rules, meaning flights over populated areas probably won’t be permitted until 2020 or later.27

Meanwhile, the growing number of unauthorized drone flights in controlled airspace has prompted conversations about national security concerns.  Rogue drones have been known to interfere with rescue operations and firefighter efforts.28  Rogue drones have increased at sporting events and concerts, with a man arrested not long ago for using an unauthorized drone to drop political pamphlets over a football stadium full of fans.29  Last month, reports of unauthorized drones at London’s Heathrow and Gatwick airports disrupted air travel, and an unauthorized drone was said to have collided with a Boeing 737 passenger jet over Tijuana, Mexico.30  Just this week, flights were grounded at Newark International Airport after a pilot told air traffic control that an unauthorized drone came within thirty feet of his aircraft.31  According to the FAA, over 6,000 drones have been spotted mid-flight by airline personnel, some flying just a few feet away from commercial aircraft.32  Such sightings provide insight on the serious risk of drone collision.  A 2017 FAA study concluded that a drone collision could cause significant damage to the surface areas of commercial aircraft.33

This year, the FAA will likely act under its authority granted in the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 to combat dangerous drone use.  On October 5, 2018, President Trump signed the Act, building on the groundwork laid by the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2012.34  The Act requires the FAA update many of its existing programs and establish new ones, including (1) a process for accepting risk-based, consensus safety standards related to design, production, and modification of small drones; (2) authorizations for government agencies seeking to operate drones for police and firefighting purposes; (3) special permits for drones to operate beyond the visual line of sight; and (4) parameters for allowing commercial drone delivery packages.35  The Act also requires the FAA to submit research reports to Congress on pressing issues like drone data privacy and security.36

Among the previously mentioned provisions, the Act provides new authority for the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to “mitigate the threat” that drones pose “to the security of a covered facility.”37  Such mitigating actions allow for warnings to drone operators, jamming signals, tracking and seizing drones, and using “reasonable force, if necessary to destroy the UAS.”38  The authority comes in response to the increasing use of drones by terrorist and criminal groups for nefarious purposes such as cross-border smuggling operations.39  Controversy remains about the Act as it gives the DHS and DOJ wide discretion to define when a drone poses a “threat” and when it threatens “a covered facility,” without prior judicial authorization.40  If these agencies determine that a drone meets these two definitions, they are allowed to track, seize, or destroy the drone.  In 2019, we expect DHS and DOJ to roll out proposed rules under this new authority.  We expect the rules to have a similar effect to those issued by the Department of Defense (“DOD”) and Department of Energy (“DOE”), agencies which received the authority to track and mitigate drone threats under the 2017 and 2018 National Defense Authorization Acts.41 

The Commercial Drone Alliance (“the Alliance”), a group that represents members of the commercial drone industry, has warned that any legislation, if not narrowly tailored, could interfere with the commercial development and operation of drones.42  The Alliance issued guiding principles for legislators, including that commercial operators be given sufficient notice of targeted activity and be listed in a government database as “trusted” operators to minimize false identification of threats.43

The Uniform Law Commission (ULC), a group working on a proposed “Tort Law Relating to Drones Act,” also advocates narrowly tailored commercial drone laws, recommending that states draw a line at 200 feet in the sky to establish new aerial trespass zones for property owners.44  Yet, such legislation could inhibit commercial development of drone deliveries by introducing complicated no-fly zones in people’s backyards.  In the meantime, states like Pennsylvania have passed laws to protect people’s privacy from drone use.45

Ultimately, 2019 is shaping up to be a landmark year for U.S. drone law and regulation. The UAV Team here at BCLP is monitoring the drone landscape for further development.

The authors would like to recognize summer associate Bernice Diaz for her contribution to this article.


  1. Ben Husch, Congress Passes Five-year FAA Reauthorization Act, National Conference of State Legislatures Blog (Oct. 4, 2018),
  2. UAS Data Exchange (LAANC), Federal Aviation Administration,
  3. Mike Rees, FAA Begins UAS Integration Pilot Program, Unmanned Systems Technology (Aug. 31, 2018),
  4. John Haughey, Two Pre-filed 2019 Bills Seek to Lift Ban on Law Enforcement’s Use of Drones, (Dec. 29, 2018); see also Dan Boylan, Drones Likely to be Regulated by State, City Governments in 2019, The Washington Times (Jan. 1, 2019),
  5. Remarks Prepared for Delivery by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine L. Chao, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, U.S. Department of Transportation (Jan. 14, 2019), (hereinafter “Statement of Elaine Chao, Transportation Secretary”).
  6. Id.
  7. Id.
  8. Olivia Beavers, Trump Administration Proposes Allowing Drone Flights at Night, over Populous Areas, The Hill (Jan. 14, 2019),
  9. Miriam McNabb, FAA Proposes New Drone Regs and a New Pilot Program: One More Step Towards Drone Integration, dronelife (Jan. 15, 2019),
  10. Brianna Gurciullo, Eager Drone Industry Gets New Regs, Despite Shutdown, Politico (Jan 14, 2019),
  11. Id.
  12. Taylor Hatmaker, New FAA Proposal Would Let Drones Fly over People and at Night without a Waiver, Tech Crunch (Jan. 14, 2019),
  13. DOT UAS Initiatives, Federal Aviation Administration,
  14. Statement of Elaine Chao, Transportation Secretary, supra note 5.
  15. David Shepardson, U.S. Proposes to Allow Drone Operation at Night, over People, Reuters (Jan. 14, 2019),
  16. 5 Benefits of Drones (UAS) That Might Surprise You, SRI Int’l  (Aug. 7, 2013),
  17. Devin Coldewey, First Ever Drone-Delivered Kidney is No Worse for Wear, Tech Crunch (Nov. 19, 2018),; the Rise of Drones in Construction, DroneDeploy (Jun 7, 2018),
  18. Hyundai Motor Partners with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Startup ‘Top Flight’ to Take Future Mobility to New Heights, Automotive World (Nov. 15, 2018),; Vidi Nene, Airborne for Months, Solar-Powered Autonomous UAV from Boeing Subsidiary, Drone Below (Nov. 19, 2018),
  19. Drones Reporting for Work, Goldman Sachs & Co.,
  20. Id.
  21. Id.
  22. Anti-Drone Market Size Worth $1.85 Billion By 2024 | CAGR: 24.1%, Grand View Research (May 2018),
  23. Colin Snow, Seven Trends That Will Shape the Commercial Drone Industry in 2019, Forbes, (Jan. 7, 2019)
  24. Gurciullo, supra note 10.
  25. Alan Levin, Groundbreaking U.S. Plan Would Permit Drone Flights Over Crowds, Bloomberg News (Jan. 14, 2019); Frank Wolfe, ADS-B Unlikely Tracking Technology for Small Drones, Avionics International, (Jan. 6, 2019)
  26. Id. (“AUDS is capable of detecting, tracking and defeating small unmanned aircraft by combining lectronic-scanning radar target detection, electro-optical (EO) tracking, classification and directional RF inhibition capability, according to information from LiteEye, which distributes the system in the U.S.”)
  27. Id.
  28. Marco Margaritoff, Police Warn Drone Users Not to Interfere with L.A. Wildfire Operations, The Drive (Sep. 5, 2017),
  29. Marco Margaritoff, NFL Security Official Supports Bill Allowing Feds to Track, Seize, Destroy Drones, The Drive (Sep. 14, 2018),
  30. Heathrow Airport Drone Investigated by Police and Military, BBC News, (Jan. 9, 2019); Andrea Navarro and Alan Levin, Boeing 737 Passenger Jet Damaged in Possible Midair Drone Hit, Bloomberg (Dec. 13, 2018),
  31. Dave Lee, Drone Sighting Disrupts Major US Airport, BBC News, (Jan. 23, 2019)
  32. Id.
  33. Id.
  34. Steve Amitay, New Aviation Law Makes Positive Changes to Current Rules for Commercial Drone Use, ASIS International (Nov. 1, 2018),
  35. The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, H.R. 302, 115th Cong. (2018); Jeff Davis, Summary of Final Compromise FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Eno Transportation Weekly, (Sept. 24, 2018)
  36. Id.
  37. Id.
  38. Amitay, supra note 34.
  39. See Alexa Lardieri, Homeland Security: Warns of Weaponized Drones as Terror Threat, U.S. News (Nov. 10, 2017),; Stephen Dinan, Drones Become Latest Tool Drug Cartels Use to Smuggle Drugs into U.S., The Wash. Times (Aug. 20, 2017),
  40. See Coalition Letter Opposing S. 2836, The Preventing Emerging Threats Act of 2018, ACLU (June 12, 2018), [hereinafter Coalition Letter].
  41. Statement of David Glawe, Under Secretary of Intelligence and Analysis, and Hayley Chang, Deputy General Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Sec., U.S. Senate Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Gov’t. Affairs, Hearing on S. 2836, the Preventing Emerging Threats Act of 2018: Countering Malicious Drones (June 6, 2018),
  42. See Miriam McNabb, Countering Malicious Drones: Drone Stakeholders Comment on Tomorrow’s U.S. Senate Committee Hearing, DroneLife
  43. Id.
  44. Snow, supra note 23.
  45. Id.