Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

James Fairburn

James Fairburn
  1. People /

James Fairburn

James Fairburn

Partner


London
James Fairburn
  1. People /

James Fairburn

James Fairburn

Partner


London

James Fairburn

Partner

London

T: +44 (0) 20 3400 3710

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

  • Resources

Biography

James joined BCLP as a trainee in 2012 and qualified into the Insurance and Reinsurance team in 2014. Acting primarily for insurers and reinsurers, James has been exposed to a broad range of issues and disputes, including:

Coverage:

  • Reinsurance claims arising from major losses such as COVID-19, 9/11, volcanic eruption, and other catastrophes.
  • Construction/property claims including from fire, water damage, and cladding/Grenfell-related issues.
  • Financial lines claims relating to coverage available under professional liability, W&I and D&O covers.

Defence:

  • W&I claims arising, typically, from alleged tax indemnity and/or accounting warranty breaches.
  • Professionals, including solicitors and barristers facing negligence or conduct allegations.
  • Insurance market, including alleged breaches of coverholder or binding authority agreements, and broker follow-on claims.

Advisory:

  • To pension trustees and annuity providers on de-risking transactions structured using insurance and reinsurance policies.
  • Policy wording advice, including redrafting products to ensure they were Insurance Act 2015 compliant.
  • Due diligence on insurance and reinsurance programs, including trade credit and credit default products.

Admissions

  • England and Wales

Related Capabilities

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Insurance: Corporate & Transactional Insurance: Corporate & Transactional

Insurance & Reinsurance Insurance & Reinsurance

Financial Institutions Financial Institutions

Finance Finance

Insurance (Class Actions) Insurance (Class Actions)

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Insurance: Corporate & Transactional

  • Insurance & Reinsurance

  • Financial Institutions

  • Finance

  • Insurance (Class Actions)

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Resources

Publications

Fast track arbitration for insurance disputes: ARIAS rules under the spotlight

Related Insights

Awards
Oct 16, 2025

Chambers 2026 UK guide ranks BCLP in 36 practice areas and recognises 76 individual lawyers

In the 2026 edition of Chambers UK BCLP received 36 practice area rankings and 76 individual lawyer recognitions. This year, the firm is recognized in six new practice areas and improved to a Band 1 ranking for Commercial Contracts, as well as a Band 2 ranking for Hotels and Leisure.  
Insights
Feb 13, 2024

English Court decides Covid-19 is a “catastrophe”

The English Court has, for the first time, considered the meaning of a “catastrophe”, as well as how Hours Clauses work in the context of non-damage business interruption losses claimed under two Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaties.  While the Covid-19 pandemic may feel like a distant memory to some, disputes about the recovery of Covid-19 losses continue to trouble many reinsureds and reinsurers.  The two key issues considered by the Commercial Court in determining appeals from arbitration awards made in Unipol Re v CovĂ©a and Markel v Gen Re may bring welcome, and valuable, guidance to those in the reinsurance industry debating these terms. Those underwriting or purchasing “catastrophe” covers may also want to carefully consider this judgment and whether the Court’s approach to the meaning of that word aligns with their coverage expectations.
News
Nov 10, 2023

BCLP names global group to partnership

Insights
Jan 19, 2023

Russia/Ukraine – what will be the impact of sanctions on (Re)Insurers?

Insights
Oct 19, 2022

Reinsurance: aggregation of COVID losses post-Stonegate

Insights
Mar 02, 2022

Corbin & King: Denial of Access clause and Composite policy cover for COVID-19

The Commercial Court has found in Corbin & King Ltd v Axa Insurance UK Plc that a Non-Damage Denial of Access (“NDDA”) clause responds to COVID-19 business interruption losses.  Further, that where the policy provides cover by reference to the Insureds’ “business” where access to its “premises” was restricted, that the insured would be entitled to claim the sub-limit of cover in respect of each premises, for each lockdown or restriction.  This decision, if upheld by appellate courts, could materially increase some insurers’ exposure to COVID-19 business interruption losses if they have underwritten comparable NDDA covers.
Insights
Feb 25, 2022

Is COVID-19 a Catastrophe?

Insights
Jun 02, 2021

When can Insurers avoid for non-disclosure?

Since the Insurance Act 2015 (the “IA 2015”) came into force on 12 August 2016, the Courts have not been called upon yet to interpret its provisions. Jones v Zurich Insurance Plc handed down on 18 May 2021, considers the interpretation and application of certain provisions of the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 (the “CIA 2012”), some of which are materially the same as comparable provisions in the IA 2015.  Jones also gives insight as to the nature and extent of evidence that would be required for an insurer to be entitled to avoid a policy for breach of the IA 2015 duty of fair presentation.

Related Insights

Awards
Oct 16, 2025
Chambers 2026 UK guide ranks BCLP in 36 practice areas and recognises 76 individual lawyers
In the 2026 edition of Chambers UK BCLP received 36 practice area rankings and 76 individual lawyer recognitions. This year, the firm is recognized in six new practice areas and improved to a Band 1 ranking for Commercial Contracts, as well as a Band 2 ranking for Hotels and Leisure.  
Insights
Feb 13, 2024
English Court decides Covid-19 is a “catastrophe”
The English Court has, for the first time, considered the meaning of a “catastrophe”, as well as how Hours Clauses work in the context of non-damage business interruption losses claimed under two Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaties.  While the Covid-19 pandemic may feel like a distant memory to some, disputes about the recovery of Covid-19 losses continue to trouble many reinsureds and reinsurers.  The two key issues considered by the Commercial Court in determining appeals from arbitration awards made in Unipol Re v CovĂ©a and Markel v Gen Re may bring welcome, and valuable, guidance to those in the reinsurance industry debating these terms. Those underwriting or purchasing “catastrophe” covers may also want to carefully consider this judgment and whether the Court’s approach to the meaning of that word aligns with their coverage expectations.
News
Nov 10, 2023
BCLP names global group to partnership
Insights
Jan 19, 2023
Russia/Ukraine – what will be the impact of sanctions on (Re)Insurers?
Insights
Oct 19, 2022
Reinsurance: aggregation of COVID losses post-Stonegate
Insights
Mar 02, 2022
Corbin & King: Denial of Access clause and Composite policy cover for COVID-19
The Commercial Court has found in Corbin & King Ltd v Axa Insurance UK Plc that a Non-Damage Denial of Access (“NDDA”) clause responds to COVID-19 business interruption losses.  Further, that where the policy provides cover by reference to the Insureds’ “business” where access to its “premises” was restricted, that the insured would be entitled to claim the sub-limit of cover in respect of each premises, for each lockdown or restriction.  This decision, if upheld by appellate courts, could materially increase some insurers’ exposure to COVID-19 business interruption losses if they have underwritten comparable NDDA covers.
Insights
Feb 25, 2022
Is COVID-19 a Catastrophe?
Insights
Jun 02, 2021
When can Insurers avoid for non-disclosure?
Since the Insurance Act 2015 (the “IA 2015”) came into force on 12 August 2016, the Courts have not been called upon yet to interpret its provisions. Jones v Zurich Insurance Plc handed down on 18 May 2021, considers the interpretation and application of certain provisions of the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 (the “CIA 2012”), some of which are materially the same as comparable provisions in the IA 2015.  Jones also gives insight as to the nature and extent of evidence that would be required for an insurer to be entitled to avoid a policy for breach of the IA 2015 duty of fair presentation.
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP