""

Antitrust & Competition

Antitrust & Competition

Antitrust & Competition

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Overview

Our leading Antitrust & Competition practice includes over 75 dedicated lawyers located in 15 offices across the US, UK, Belgium, France and Germany. Our significant global coverage is combined with intimate local knowledge of markets and regulatory regimes. Whether your issue is international or domestic, we will provide the strategic insight necessary to help you manage antitrust and competition law risk and at the same time achieve your commercial objectives. Our team provides commercially-focused, full-service competition and regulatory support to clients, ranging from compliance policies and training to cartel investigations and merger controlThe experience of our team is substantive and diverse – in private practice, in industry, at regulators, in economics and in law. We are well-equipped to offer innovative, efficient and effective solutions. We are continually recognised for our work, and Global Competition Review has named us “one of the world’s leading competition practices”. 

In addition to working with clients dealing with significant domestic and international cartel investigations, we act as trusted advisors to clients on the full spectrum of antitrust issues, including assessments of supply and distribution arrangements and other vertical agreements, horizontal cooperation agreements and monopolization/abuse of dominance questions.  Given the importance of compliance, we help companies devise and implement policies by understanding the risks facing their businesses. Whethere are concerns about conduct, we work with clients to undertake the necessary internal investigations, focussing on identifying and mitigating risk. We also have extensive experience helping clients with queries relating to State aid and public procurement. With years of experience advising clients across regulated sectors, we bring a strategic approach to achieving a successful outcome, and our strength and depth across multiple industries provides clients with exceptional insight into the common themes and challenges facing regulated businesses. 

We help our clients minimise the cost and burden of complying with the multiple systems of merger control that now exist worldwide, and help clients obtain clearance in those jurisdictions where notification is required, in the shortest time and in an efficient and co-ordinated manner. Members of our team have successfully advised on many high profile and complex transactions, including obtaining HSR clearance from the US competition authorities and responding to second requests, as well as Phase II investigations by the European Commission and UK Competition and Markets Authority. Our strong relationships with the US, EU, UK and other competition authorities enable us to navigate the merger control process smoothly, from briefing papers and pre-notification meetings to notifications, oral hearings and, where necessary, negotiated modifications and remedies. We are able rapidly to assess whether and where your transaction may need to be disclosed, and we advise you as to regulatory risk to allow for well-informed decisions that affect the future of your business.  

In the past decade, our award-winning team has been at the forefront of advising clients in disputes concerning alleged anti-competitive conduct, including bringing and defending damages actions and defending class action suits (involving allegations of unlawful agreements, monopolization, and abuse of dominance). Globally, we have acted in many key competition litigation cases. Unlike many practices, we represent a wide range of clients, including both defendants and claimants/plaintiffs. Using our comprehensive knowledge and experience from different standpoints, we stay one step ahead in formulating successful strategies.

Given the current climate of increased antitrust enforcement, a business of any size is likely to receive a third-party subpoena in an agency enforcement investigation, such as those conducted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the Department of Justice (DOJ). When a business receives a third-party subpoena for documents, the first concern is always responding to the subpoena. But that is only the beginning. Once compliance is finished, the main concerns are: who will see my documents? How can I prevent other parties—who may be my closest competitors—from seeing my documents? And how can I protect my confidential documents in a cost-effective way? BCLP has extensive experience responding to third-party subpoenas efficiently and cost-effectively. In particular, we can advise you on:

  • What level of confidentiality to choose in a protective order?
  • Will you be successful in adding further layers of confidentiality?
  • How can you limit the access of parties’ employees to your documents?
  • Will you be able to limit outside counsel’s access to your documents?
  • Is complete inaccessibility by parties’ employees to your documents achievable?
  • How to make sure you know who exactly will see your documents?
  • Will you know if the government wants to use your documents outside of the current lawsuit?
  • How can you obtain notice from the parties if your documents are being used publicly?
  • What will happen to your documents at the end of a lawsuit?

If you have any questions about third-party subpoenas or would like to receive training/guidance on this topic, please contact David B. Schwartz, Ashley Kim or your usual BCLP contact.

Rebecca A. D. Nelson, Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis, Washington
Rebecca A. D. Nelson, Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis, Washington
+1 314 259 2412

Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley
+44 20 3400 4630
Rebecca A. D. Nelson, Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis, Washington
Rebecca A. D. Nelson, Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis, Washington
+1 314 259 2412

Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley
+44 20 3400 4630

Meet The Team

Rebecca A. D. Nelson, Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis, Washington
Rebecca A. D. Nelson, Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis, Washington
+1 314 259 2412

Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley
+44 20 3400 4630

Related Capabilities

  • Government Contracts & Public Procurement

Related Insights

Insights
May 08, 2026

The Draft EU Merger Guidelines – Key Takeaways for Dealmakers

On 30 April 2026, the European Commission released its much awaited draft merger guidelines (“Draft Guidelines”). The Draft Guidelines are intended to replace two current and dated guidance documents: the Commission’s Horizontal Merger Guidelines (published in 2004) and its Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines (published in 2008). The Draft Guidelines propose to bring the approach to European merger control into line with a changed geo-political, security and trade context, as well as reflecting other policy drivers that have become much more prominent since 2004 and 2008, such as innovation, resilience and sustainability. The release of the Draft Guidelines follows significant political pressure within the Commission to modernise the approach to merger control and help European businesses succeed on the world stage. The release of the Draft Guidelines – an area traditionally reserved to the Competition Commissioner and specialists within the Directorate General for Competition – has  been a key priority for Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who noted when the Draft Guidelines were released that they are intended to better support companies to thrive, scale and innovate, and to “meet the realities of the fiercely competitive global economy and boost our competitiveness, while preserving the predictability and certainty that investors value most in Europe.”
Insights
May 06, 2026

Maryland Gets Crabby with Surveillance Pricing

Maryland recently passed the Protection from Predatory Pricing Act, becoming the first state to ban “surveillance pricing,” or the use of personal data to set consumer-specific prices, in the food sector. The Act, following recent actions by New York and California, reflects a broader state trend of regulating surveillance pricing across the U.S. Whether the Act’s provisions effectively “ban” surveillance pricing in practice remains to be seen, but it may pave the way for other states to create their own robust surveillance pricing restrictions.
Insights
Apr 30, 2026

Law Commission Announces Major New Project on Consumer Class Actions Regime

On 20 April 2026, the Law Commission of England and Wales announced a major new project on the introduction of a collective class action regime for consumer actions. The review will explore how a new regime could be designed, and the benefits and risks associated with a consumer class actions regime.  The review follows significant changes made to the consumer protection landscape with the entry into force of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2004 (“DMCCA”) last year (which  granted the CMA the power to directly enforce consumer protection law (without needing to go to court),  issue infringement notices, impose fines of up to 10% of annual global turnover, order consumer redress and issue other directions. The proposal to permit collective consumer actions is the latest in a series of steps targeted at bolstering the consumer law enforcement regime.  As the CMA ratchets up its enforcement activity in the areas of drip pricing and fake reviews (discussed in our recent briefings here: CMA Imposes First Financial Penalty Under New Consumer Powers in Drip Pricing Crackdown; CMA Steps Up Enforcement on Fake and Misleading Reviews: What Businesses Need to Know), it is worth considering how rights to bring collective consumer actions will change the UK’s consumer protection landscape.  The Law Commission has invited views on the project, providing a valuable opportunity for stakeholders to influence the scope and shape of any regime ultimately put in place.
News
Mar 19, 2026

Chambers Europe 2026

Related Insights

Insights
May 08, 2026
The Draft EU Merger Guidelines – Key Takeaways for Dealmakers
On 30 April 2026, the European Commission released its much awaited draft merger guidelines (“Draft Guidelines”). The Draft Guidelines are intended to replace two current and dated guidance documents: the Commission’s Horizontal Merger Guidelines (published in 2004) and its Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines (published in 2008). The Draft Guidelines propose to bring the approach to European merger control into line with a changed geo-political, security and trade context, as well as reflecting other policy drivers that have become much more prominent since 2004 and 2008, such as innovation, resilience and sustainability. The release of the Draft Guidelines follows significant political pressure within the Commission to modernise the approach to merger control and help European businesses succeed on the world stage. The release of the Draft Guidelines – an area traditionally reserved to the Competition Commissioner and specialists within the Directorate General for Competition – has  been a key priority for Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who noted when the Draft Guidelines were released that they are intended to better support companies to thrive, scale and innovate, and to “meet the realities of the fiercely competitive global economy and boost our competitiveness, while preserving the predictability and certainty that investors value most in Europe.”
Insights
May 06, 2026
Maryland Gets Crabby with Surveillance Pricing
Maryland recently passed the Protection from Predatory Pricing Act, becoming the first state to ban “surveillance pricing,” or the use of personal data to set consumer-specific prices, in the food sector. The Act, following recent actions by New York and California, reflects a broader state trend of regulating surveillance pricing across the U.S. Whether the Act’s provisions effectively “ban” surveillance pricing in practice remains to be seen, but it may pave the way for other states to create their own robust surveillance pricing restrictions.
News
May 01, 2026
BCLP Files Class Action Exposing Illegal Good Day Farm Cartel
Insights
Apr 30, 2026
Law Commission Announces Major New Project on Consumer Class Actions Regime
On 20 April 2026, the Law Commission of England and Wales announced a major new project on the introduction of a collective class action regime for consumer actions. The review will explore how a new regime could be designed, and the benefits and risks associated with a consumer class actions regime.  The review follows significant changes made to the consumer protection landscape with the entry into force of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2004 (“DMCCA”) last year (which  granted the CMA the power to directly enforce consumer protection law (without needing to go to court),  issue infringement notices, impose fines of up to 10% of annual global turnover, order consumer redress and issue other directions. The proposal to permit collective consumer actions is the latest in a series of steps targeted at bolstering the consumer law enforcement regime.  As the CMA ratchets up its enforcement activity in the areas of drip pricing and fake reviews (discussed in our recent briefings here: CMA Imposes First Financial Penalty Under New Consumer Powers in Drip Pricing Crackdown; CMA Steps Up Enforcement on Fake and Misleading Reviews: What Businesses Need to Know), it is worth considering how rights to bring collective consumer actions will change the UK’s consumer protection landscape.  The Law Commission has invited views on the project, providing a valuable opportunity for stakeholders to influence the scope and shape of any regime ultimately put in place.
Insights
Apr 22, 2026
Bugged by Non-Competes: FTC Calls the Exterminator on Rollins, Inc.
Insights
Apr 10, 2026
First Application by the French Competition Authority of the New Penalty Regime for Professional Associations
Insights
Apr 01, 2026
European Commission Unveils Industrial Accelerator Act
Insights
Mar 30, 2026
CMA Steps Up Enforcement on Fake and Misleading Reviews: What Businesses Need to Know
News
Mar 19, 2026
Chambers Europe 2026