Insights

Partners Author Article on ‘Peyton’ as it Applies to NY Zoning Disputes

Partners Author Article on ‘Peyton’ as it Applies to NY Zoning Disputes

Feb 01, 2021
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

New York Partners Philip Karmel, James Colgate and Judith Gallent authored an article published in the February edition of the New York Real Estate Law Reporterconcerning open space and zoning disputes. Specifically, they considered the New York Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Peyton v. BSA which held, in the context of a zoning lot containing several residential buildings, that the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York does not require an area to be accessible to all residents of the zoning lot for the area to qualify as open space. “The decision is important to the assemblage of multiple tax lots in a single zoning lot because, as the Appellate Division acknowledged, it is rarely practicable for the residents of one building to have access to the front yards, rear yards, or rooftop open space on the tax lots of unrelated building owners within the same zoning lot,” they wrote. “The Court of Appeals’ deference to DOB and BSA in Peyton is welcome news to land owners and developers considering the risks of constructing a new building in New York City.” The firm successfully represented the property owner before the Court of Appeals in the Peyton case.

Related Practice Areas

  • Planning & Zoning

  • Commercial Real Estate

  • Real Estate Sector

  • Real Estate

Meet The Team

+1 212 541 2311
+1 212 541 2127

Meet The Team

+1 212 541 2389
+1 212 541 2311
+1 212 541 2127
+1 212 541 2389

Meet The Team

+1 212 541 2311
+1 212 541 2127
+1 212 541 2389
This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.