Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Isabel Guariglia

Isabel Guariglia
  1. People /

Isabel Guariglia

Isabel Guariglia

Associate


St. Louis
Isabel Guariglia
  1. People /

Isabel Guariglia

Isabel Guariglia

Associate


St. Louis

Isabel Guariglia

Associate

St. Louis

T: +1 314 259 2023

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

Biography

Isabel is a BCLP fellow in the St Louis office, splitting her time between the firm’s Business and Commercial Disputes Practice Group and pro bono work for the Midwest Innocence Project. At BCLP, she assists on a range of general litigation matters. Isabel's pro bono work at the Midwest Innocence Project focuses on litigation and prevention of wrongful convictions.

During Law school, Isabel clerked for the Hon. Judge Amy Weinhaus at the EEOC and provided immigration legal services with the Migrant Immigrant Community Action Project. She also served as managing editor of the Global Studies Law Review.

Prior to attending law school, Isabel received her B.A. in journalism at the University of Missouri, Columbia, where she graduated in the top 10% of her class.

Admissions

  • Missouri, 2023

Education

  • Washington University in St. Louis, J.D., 2023
  • University of Missouri, B.A., magna cum laude, 2020

Related Capabilities

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Regulation, Compliance & Advisory Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

Class Actions & Mass Torts Class Actions & Mass Torts

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

  • Class Actions & Mass Torts

Related Insights

Insights
Nov 21, 2024

Key Takeaways from Snyder v. United States

Snyder v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1947 (2024), which held that a federal bribery statute (18 U.S.C. § 666) does not criminalize “gratuities”—payments made corruptly to public officials after-the-fact as rewards for their actions—was lauded as a great win for the white-collar bar. But what about the Supreme Court’s approach to statutory interpretation in Snyder? Not so great, at least in our view. Snyder’s majority opinion provides a playbook for the Supreme Court, in this and future iterations, to engage in a policy-first, text-last approach to statutory interpretation that should make our profession wary, white-collar bar included.

Related Insights

Insights
Nov 21, 2024
Key Takeaways from Snyder v. United States
Snyder v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1947 (2024), which held that a federal bribery statute (18 U.S.C. § 666) does not criminalize “gratuities”—payments made corruptly to public officials after-the-fact as rewards for their actions—was lauded as a great win for the white-collar bar. But what about the Supreme Court’s approach to statutory interpretation in Snyder? Not so great, at least in our view. Snyder’s majority opinion provides a playbook for the Supreme Court, in this and future iterations, to engage in a policy-first, text-last approach to statutory interpretation that should make our profession wary, white-collar bar included.
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP