Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Lily Rudy

Lily Rudy
  1. People /

Lily Rudy

Lily Rudy

Counsel


Washington
Lily Rudy
  1. People /

Lily Rudy

Lily Rudy

Counsel


Washington

Lily Rudy

Counsel

Washington

T: +1 202 508 6075

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

Biography

Lily Rudy is a counsel in the firm’s Antitrust and Competition Practice Group. She is an experienced antitrust attorney with a strong track record in complex investigations and litigation. Lily was a key member of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Amazon monopolization investigation and litigation team. She also investigated and litigated multiple high-profile merger challenges in federal court and administrative proceedings, including Tronox/Cristal, Axon/VieVu, and Nvidia/ARM.

With active courtroom experience, Lily has first chaired over a dozen depositions and investigational hearings, conducted direct and cross examinations, and drafted motions, complaints, and Commission recommendations. She has worked alongside leading economic experts and interacted with several international enforcement agencies.

Before entering private practice, Lily was a Staff Attorney at the FTC, where she was actively involved in recruitment and led her group’s law school intern program, demonstrating a commitment to mentorship and talent development in the antitrust field. Lily clerked for the Honorable Charles Lettow of the United States Court of Federal Claims. She earned her J.D. from The George Washington University Law School, where she served as production editor for The George Washington Law Review, and her undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan.

Admissions

  • District of Columbia, 2015

Education

  • The George Washington University, J.D., cum laude, 2013
  • University of Michigan, B.S.E., summa cum laude, 2010

Related Capabilities

Antitrust & Competition Antitrust & Competition

Investigations Investigations

Litigation Litigation

  • Antitrust & Competition

  • Investigations

  • Litigation

Related Insights

Insights
Sep 30, 2025

Blocking Their Own Shot: FTC’s Recent Arguments Could Impact If and How FTC Investigations Are Conducted

In Media Matters v. Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) suggested that issues surrounding the scope, validity, and enforceability of a civil investigative demand (CID) should be addressed during an enforcement action. This position could have significant implications for the FTC’s ability to conduct investigations due to the public nature of enforcement actions, limited FTC resources, and the potential for an increased number of challenges to the FTC’s authority to start investigations in the first place.

Related Insights

Insights
Sep 30, 2025
Blocking Their Own Shot: FTC’s Recent Arguments Could Impact If and How FTC Investigations Are Conducted
In Media Matters v. Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) suggested that issues surrounding the scope, validity, and enforceability of a civil investigative demand (CID) should be addressed during an enforcement action. This position could have significant implications for the FTC’s ability to conduct investigations due to the public nature of enforcement actions, limited FTC resources, and the potential for an increased number of challenges to the FTC’s authority to start investigations in the first place.
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP