Looking up at a crane on a construction site

Construction Disputes

Construction Disputes

Construction Disputes

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Overview

Construction is a dynamic process fraught with complex relationships, sophisticated contracts, financing, design, engineering, procurement, and supply.  It’s a world of unavoidable risk, and no matter how civil the beginning, exposure to such risk all but ensures the need for compromise and the potential for dispute. 

To effectively avoid claims and resolve disputes, construction lawyers must be skilled negotiators, draftsmen, communicators, administrators and advocates.  This combination of skills is precisely why BCLP provides unsurpassed value to its construction industry clients. 

We work with many of our clients at an early stage, preventing problems on site escalating into formal proceedings. We provide practical advice, fight hard when necessary and maintain pressure on the opponents, whilst always looking to achieve the earliest possible resolution, often through proactive use of mediation and other forms of ADR. 

We are extremely experienced at handling matters in a variety of dispute resolution forums, including those that are prevalent in the domestic markets in which we operate (for example mediation, statutory adjudication regimes, or litigation in national or specialist courts). In addition we advise on disputes relating to international projects across many sectors, including large-scale international arbitration across different jurisdictions and under institutional or ad hoc rules, wherever the seat.  

The volume of repeat business from our extensive client list of major industry players (including public and private sector employers, contractors and major specialist suppliers) across a very wide range of sectors and our reputation in the field, is testament to the quality of service we provide.

The Legal 500: Construction Comparative Guide

The Legal 500: Construction Comparative Guide

What are the biggest challenges and opportunities facing the UK construction sector?

From general legal and regulatory compliance obligations, licensing and financial aspects to industry trends and developments, we share insights in this dedicated chapter.

Read our chapter Read our chapter

Meet The Team

Shy Jackson
Shy Jackson
+44 (0) 20 3400 4998

Charles Lilley

Charles Lilley
+971 2 652 0302
James Clarke
James Clarke
+44 (0) 20 3400 3507

Experience

  • Represented major general contractor on regional highway and light rail project administration and litigation including judgment on fraud and veil-piercing claims against subcontractor.
  • Represented a US hotel developer in multiple lawsuits and arbitration proceedings relating to design, construction defect and delay claims.
  • Acted in a dispute between the owners and developers of a container port in the Middle East and the contractors responsible for building an extension to the port.
  • Advising in relation to one of the largest PFI contract disputes in the health sector. The advice included wide ranging issues of a complex nature arising out of the Project Company’s performance at two hospitals run by a NHS Foundation Trust, which is one of the largest in the UK  with a turnover in excess of £1billion.
  • Providing project advice to a UK university and acting on its behalf in a number of claims brought by four of the contractors involved in delivering this major mixed-use development,  including infrastructure, student accommodation, retail and community building contractors.

Related Insights

Insights
Feb 26, 2026

Darchem v Bouygues - Adjudication by an individual joint venture party

In this article, first published in PLC Construction, James Clarke and Adam Wade-Baylis consider the judgment in Darchem Engineering Ltd v Bouygues Travaux Publics and another [2026] EWHC 220 (TCC).
Awards
Feb 12, 2026

Chambers Global 2026

Insights
Feb 10, 2026

Building Safety Act – remediation contribution orders - respondents’ appeal dismissed in Vista Tower

In Grey GR Limited Partnership v Edgewater (Stevenage) and others, the Upper Tribunal has dismissed the respondents’ appeal against the First Tier Tribunal decision granting a remediation contribution order (“RCO”) under s124 Building Safety Act 2022 (“BSA”) against 75 respondents.
Insights
Jan 27, 2026

DIFC Court confirms its supervisory role in arbitration seated in the DIFC

A recent decision by the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Court in  Oswin v (1) Otila (2) Ondray [2025] DIFC ARB 032 (16 September 2025) has provided welcome clarity on the supervisory jurisdiction of the DIFC Court over arbitrations seated in the DIFC.
Insights
Jan 21, 2026

Providence v Hexagon - The challenge of contract interpretation

In this article, first published in PLC Construction, Shy Jackson considers the Supreme Court's decision in Providence Building Services Ltd v Hexagon Housing Association Ltd [2026] UKSC 1 that a contractor was not entitled to terminate a JCT Design and Build Contract, 2016 Edition for repeated late payments (specified defaults) by its employer in circumstances where the right to terminate for the first specified default had not accrued.
Insights
Jan 07, 2026

Conditions Precedent and deemed fulfilment

Conditions precedent play an important role in contracts and it is often said that a party cannot benefit from its own breach. But in King Crude Carriers SA and others v Ridgebury November LLC and others [2025] UKSC 39, the Supreme Court rejected a principle from a House of Lords decision dating back to 1881, concerning whether a party can wrongfully, and in breach of contract, prevent the fulfilment of a condition precedent to that party’s payment obligation such that the innocent party cannot make a simple debt claim. In this BCLP Insight, we examine the case and consider the key takeaways.
Insights
Jan 07, 2026

Key Takeaways from the Third Grenfell Progress Report

On 17 December 2025, the government published the third Grenfell Tower Inquiry Government Progress Report (Progress Report) in addition to the Single Construction Regulator prospectus and consultation, the fire engineering authoritative statement and next steps document, the findings of the Building Safety Regulator’s review of the higher-risk building definition and an Implementation timeline. The Progress Report tracks progress against the government’s February 2025 Response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 report (February Response) which contained extensive commitments to reform the current building safety regime (see this BCLP Insight for more detail). The construction sector had been waiting for most of 2025 for further insights as to what and how the regime may change so it is pleasing that the Report and accompanying publications provide more detail on the government’s plans for reform. This Insight considers the key takeaways from the publications.

Related Insights

Insights
Feb 26, 2026
Darchem v Bouygues - Adjudication by an individual joint venture party
In this article, first published in PLC Construction, James Clarke and Adam Wade-Baylis consider the judgment in Darchem Engineering Ltd v Bouygues Travaux Publics and another [2026] EWHC 220 (TCC).
News
Feb 19, 2026
BCLP advises lenders on £220 million development financing of Paddington Over-Station office development
Awards
Feb 12, 2026
Chambers Global 2026
Insights
Feb 10, 2026
Building Safety Act – remediation contribution orders - respondents’ appeal dismissed in Vista Tower
In Grey GR Limited Partnership v Edgewater (Stevenage) and others, the Upper Tribunal has dismissed the respondents’ appeal against the First Tier Tribunal decision granting a remediation contribution order (“RCO”) under s124 Building Safety Act 2022 (“BSA”) against 75 respondents.
Insights
Jan 27, 2026
DIFC Court confirms its supervisory role in arbitration seated in the DIFC
A recent decision by the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Court in  Oswin v (1) Otila (2) Ondray [2025] DIFC ARB 032 (16 September 2025) has provided welcome clarity on the supervisory jurisdiction of the DIFC Court over arbitrations seated in the DIFC.
Insights
Jan 27, 2026
UAE ruling brings welcome clarity on award signatures
Insights
Jan 21, 2026
Providence v Hexagon - The challenge of contract interpretation
In this article, first published in PLC Construction, Shy Jackson considers the Supreme Court's decision in Providence Building Services Ltd v Hexagon Housing Association Ltd [2026] UKSC 1 that a contractor was not entitled to terminate a JCT Design and Build Contract, 2016 Edition for repeated late payments (specified defaults) by its employer in circumstances where the right to terminate for the first specified default had not accrued.
Insights
Jan 07, 2026
Conditions Precedent and deemed fulfilment
Conditions precedent play an important role in contracts and it is often said that a party cannot benefit from its own breach. But in King Crude Carriers SA and others v Ridgebury November LLC and others [2025] UKSC 39, the Supreme Court rejected a principle from a House of Lords decision dating back to 1881, concerning whether a party can wrongfully, and in breach of contract, prevent the fulfilment of a condition precedent to that party’s payment obligation such that the innocent party cannot make a simple debt claim. In this BCLP Insight, we examine the case and consider the key takeaways.
Insights
Jan 07, 2026
Key Takeaways from the Third Grenfell Progress Report
On 17 December 2025, the government published the third Grenfell Tower Inquiry Government Progress Report (Progress Report) in addition to the Single Construction Regulator prospectus and consultation, the fire engineering authoritative statement and next steps document, the findings of the Building Safety Regulator’s review of the higher-risk building definition and an Implementation timeline. The Progress Report tracks progress against the government’s February 2025 Response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 report (February Response) which contained extensive commitments to reform the current building safety regime (see this BCLP Insight for more detail). The construction sector had been waiting for most of 2025 for further insights as to what and how the regime may change so it is pleasing that the Report and accompanying publications provide more detail on the government’s plans for reform. This Insight considers the key takeaways from the publications.