Insights

Briefcase 2025 Quarter 2: Key Real Estate Cases and Updates

Briefcase 2025 Quarter 2: Key Real Estate Cases and Updates

Jun 24, 2025
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Case 1: Brown v Ridley and another

The Supreme Court has clarified that a reasonable belief of ownership for any 10 year period is sufficient to claim adverse possession.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Case 2: Great Jackson St Estates Ltd v Council of the City of Manchester

Great Jackson unsuccessfully sought to modify various restrictive covenants in its long lease with Manchester City Council, even though the Council had already granted planning permission for the proposed development.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Case 3: Mohammed Ahmed Bakhaty (1) and Marie-Anne Goodlad Bakhaty (2) v Hampshire County Council 

A school had to pay £1000 to a neighbour after school footballs repeatedly falling into their garden was held to be a nuisance, although the court refused to grant an injunction to stop the school using the play area.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Case 4: URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd

The Building Safety Act’s amendments to limitation periods enabled a developer to claim remedial costs of ‘voluntary’ works to fix historic defects from structural engineers.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Case 5: MVL Properties (2017) Limited v The Leadmill Limited

The Leadmill’s landlord successfully opposed the renewal of its business lease where it intends to run its own music venue at the iconic premises.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Related Capabilities

  • Real Estate

  • Real Estate Disputes

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.