Insights

Briefcase 2022 Quarter 2: Key real estate cases and updates

Briefcase 2022 Quarter 2: Key real estate cases and updates

June 2022

Jun 29, 2022
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Johnson –v- Spooner & Another – “Subject to contract” label not always conclusive
  • Milestar Limited –v- (1) Narendra Gandesha & (2) Homerton Holdings Limited – Can a tenant’s cross-claim defeat a landlord’s opposition to a lease renewal?
  • Marshall –v- Northumberland & Durham Property Trust Limited – Upper Tribunal reiterates that service charge consultation dispensation applications are all about prejudice, even in urgent cases
  • Charles Davies-Gilbert –v- (1) Henry Goacher & (2) Steven Chester – Old restrictive covenants can, and do, bite
  • CTIL –v- Compton Beauchamp Estates Limited; CTIL –v- Ashloch Ltd & AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd and On Tower UK Ltd –v- AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd – Supreme Court rules on rights of “in situ” Telecoms Code operators to seek new Code rights

Read the full publication

Related Capabilities

  • Real Estate

  • Real Estate Disputes

Meet The Team

Victoria Blanchard
+44 (0) 20 3400 3112
Cassandra Fleming
+44 (0) 20 3400 3783

Meet The Team

Alexandra Selka

Alexandra Selka

Co-Author, London

+44 (0) 20 3400 3100
Victoria Blanchard
+44 (0) 20 3400 3112
Cassandra Fleming
+44 (0) 20 3400 3783
Alexandra Selka

Alexandra Selka

Co-Author, London

+44 (0) 20 3400 3100

Meet The Team

Victoria Blanchard
+44 (0) 20 3400 3112
Cassandra Fleming
+44 (0) 20 3400 3783
Alexandra Selka

Alexandra Selka

Co-Author, London

+44 (0) 20 3400 3100
This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.