Caitlin M. Hartsell

  1. People /

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Partner

  1. People /

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Partner

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Partner

San Francisco

T: +1 415 675 3424

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Biography

Caitlin Hartsell focuses her practice on the corporate transactional issues of both public and private companies. She regularly represents clients in a broad range of transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, securities offerings, financings and restructurings. Caitlin also advises clients on corporate governance issues, general securities law issues, and the drafting and negotiation of various commercial contracts, including services agreements, licensing agreements, supply agreements, non-disclosure agreements and manufacturing agreements.

Her practice spans a number of industries including health care, financial services, renewable energy, agricultural technology, financial technology, higher education, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and insurance. In addition to her Juris Doctorate, Caitlin also has a Master of Public Health degree from Washington University in St. Louis.

  • San Francisco Recruiting Committee (Chair)
  • Corporate Training Committee (Co-Chair)

The Corporate Transparency Act

The Corporate Transparency Act

CTA resource page

Use our resource page to keep up to date on FAQs, events, and analysis & insights on the Corporate Transparency Act.

Read more 

CTA compliance tool

Many businesses are wondering if they need to comply with the CTA, and if so, whose data they may need to gather and when it should be first submitted and updated. Use our interactive CTA compliance tool to learn more about the nuts and bolts of the CTA.

Explore the tool 

Admissions

  • California, 2016
  • Illinois, 2014
  • Missouri, 2013

Education

Washington University, J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, 2013

Washington University, M.P.H., 2013

Washington University, A.B., with honors, 2009

Related Practice Areas

  • M&A & Corporate Finance

  • AdTech

  • PropTech

  • Corporate

  • Healthcare & Life Sciences

  • Renewables

  • Start-Up & Venture Capital Practice

Related Insights

Insights
Jan 29, 2024

Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act maze: hidden pitfalls of employee structuring for the large operating company exemption

*A significant point of consideration for larger, privately held companies lies in the structuring of their employee base. Many companies opt for a structure where all employees are retained in a separate subsidiary or subsidiaries for various operational reasons, including tax benefits and employment-related efficiencies. However, under the CTA, this common practice could inadvertently expose companies to reporting requirements.With the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) now in effect, it is crucial for privately held mid-sized and large companies to look into and re-examine their corporate structures to ensure compliance with the new law. While the CTA primarily targets smaller companies in lightly regulated industries, larger companies should not automatically assume they and all of their affiliates are exempt from its reporting requirements. This is particularly true for those using common employee structures where employees are retained in separate subsidiaries or affiliates of a holding or operating company of the business. Such structures could inadvertently place the holding and operating companies, as well as their subsidiaries, under the ambit of CTA’s reporting requirements, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review of such businesses’ corporate and employment structures to ensure full compliance with the CTA. We will discuss the employee prong of the “large operating company” exemption in more detail below, with examples of how an organization’s structure might affect the analysis.

Related Insights

Insights
Apr 25, 2024
FinCEN updates CTA FAQs for the first time in three months
Insights
Jan 29, 2024
Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act maze: hidden pitfalls of employee structuring for the large operating company exemption
*A significant point of consideration for larger, privately held companies lies in the structuring of their employee base. Many companies opt for a structure where all employees are retained in a separate subsidiary or subsidiaries for various operational reasons, including tax benefits and employment-related efficiencies. However, under the CTA, this common practice could inadvertently expose companies to reporting requirements.With the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) now in effect, it is crucial for privately held mid-sized and large companies to look into and re-examine their corporate structures to ensure compliance with the new law. While the CTA primarily targets smaller companies in lightly regulated industries, larger companies should not automatically assume they and all of their affiliates are exempt from its reporting requirements. This is particularly true for those using common employee structures where employees are retained in separate subsidiaries or affiliates of a holding or operating company of the business. Such structures could inadvertently place the holding and operating companies, as well as their subsidiaries, under the ambit of CTA’s reporting requirements, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review of such businesses’ corporate and employment structures to ensure full compliance with the CTA. We will discuss the employee prong of the “large operating company” exemption in more detail below, with examples of how an organization’s structure might affect the analysis.
News
Jun 09, 2022
Cross-office BCLP team advises Stifel on acquisition of German boutique M&A firm
News
Nov 23, 2021
BCLP Advises Alticor in Sale of Metagenics to Gryphon
News
Nov 10, 2021
BCLP Names Largest Class of Partner Promotions