Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAerospace & DefenseData CentersEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Emerging Themes 2026M&A deals that deliverThe Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency Act
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Catalina Diaconeasa

Catalina Diaconeasa
  1. People

Catalina Diaconeasa

Catalina Diaconeasa

Senior Associate


London
Catalina Diaconeasa
  1. People

Catalina Diaconeasa

Catalina Diaconeasa

Senior Associate


London

Catalina Diaconeasa

Senior Associate

London

T: +44 (0) 20 3400 2750

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

  • Experience

Biography

Catalina Diaconeasa is a Senior Associate in the Business and Commercial Disputes team in BCLP’s London office. Catalina was admitted as a solicitor of the Senior Courts of England and Wales in September 2018 and, as a Solicitor Advocate, she exercises full rights of audience before all civil courts of England and Wales.

Catalina has experience in a wide variety of multi-party, complex litigation in multiple jurisdictions including England and Wales, the Cayman Islands, the DIFC and the UAE. Catalina has also advised clients in international arbitration matters under the rules of the LCIA, ICC, LMAA, GAFTA and ICSID, as well as ad hoc arbitrations under the Arbitration Act 1996. Her diverse and international practice focuses on contractual and company law disputes, civil fraud cases, jurisdictional challenges, financial litigation and professional negligence.

Catalina has also completed a six-month secondment with an international trading house in London, where she advised on commercial negotiations and on LMAA and GAFTA arbitrations, as well as corporate governance issues.

She is fluent in Romanian and has a working knowledge of French, Spanish and Italian.

Catalina is recommended for commercial litigation by The Legal 500 UK (2025) where she is recognised as an “excellent associate” and “one to watch”.

Catalina received her LL.B (First Class) in 2015 from King’s College London.

Admissions

  • England and Wales

Education

King’s College London, 2015, LL.B

Related Capabilities

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Regulation, Compliance & Advisory Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

Class Actions & Mass Torts Class Actions & Mass Torts

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

  • Class Actions & Mass Torts

Experience

  • Acted for a lessee under various aircraft leases in respect of alleged payment defaults under the leases.
  • Acted for a defendant in respect of the enforcement of various obligations under a guarantee relating to mezzanine financing.
  • Represented Neoma Private Equity Fund IV in its successful defence against alleged deceit and unjust enrichment claims brought by Abdulhameed Dhia Jafar in respect of loans of $350 million and arising out of the high-profile collapse of the Abraaj Group (previously the largest firm in the Middle East) in 2018.
  • Acted for a private equity fund in a variety of cross-border disputes.
  • Represented Sberbank in its successful challenge to the jurisdiction of the English High Court to hear a $300 million conspiracy claim brought by a subsidiary of Russian bank VTB.
  • Acted for a private equity fund in connection with two LCIA arbitrations related to alleged breaches of contract.
  • Acted for a technology company in relation to a commercial dispute arising from a Shareholders’ Agreement.
  • Advised various professional services firms in relation to professional negligence claims.

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 09, 2026

Spec 1 Limited & Ors v The Export-Import Bank of China: Squaring the Circle of Asymmetric Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses

The High Court in Spec 1 & Ors v Export-Import Bank of China [2026] EQHC 1162 (Comm) analysed the principles governing asymmetric exclusive jurisdiction clauses, emphasising that such clauses in finance documentation must be interpreted in light of their commercial purpose, namely that of facilitating the lender’s enforcement against the borrower’s assets.  The High Court held that the asymmetric exclusive jurisdiction clause in this case permitted parallel proceedings in England and Singapore. Accordingly, the Borrowers could pursue their claims in England and the Lender could pursue its claims in Singapore. The Court nevertheless urged the parties to exercise their “common sense” and show more “willingness to cooperate” by finding their “own path to pragmatism” and avoiding the “forensic gamesmanship” which had led to the parallel proceedings in England and Singapore.
Insights
Feb 25, 2026

Service out: alternative methods, 'technical games' and exceptional circumstances

Insights
Oct 30, 2025

Are Third Parties excluded from Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses?

Insights
Sep 02, 2025

Better to ask for Forgiveness than (Court) Permission? “Service out” and the CPR 6.33(2B) Gateways

Insights
Aug 14, 2025

Navigating Liability for Dishonest Assistance: An Account of Profit, Loss and Constructive Trusts

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 09, 2026
Spec 1 Limited & Ors v The Export-Import Bank of China: Squaring the Circle of Asymmetric Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses
The High Court in Spec 1 & Ors v Export-Import Bank of China [2026] EQHC 1162 (Comm) analysed the principles governing asymmetric exclusive jurisdiction clauses, emphasising that such clauses in finance documentation must be interpreted in light of their commercial purpose, namely that of facilitating the lender’s enforcement against the borrower’s assets.  The High Court held that the asymmetric exclusive jurisdiction clause in this case permitted parallel proceedings in England and Singapore. Accordingly, the Borrowers could pursue their claims in England and the Lender could pursue its claims in Singapore. The Court nevertheless urged the parties to exercise their “common sense” and show more “willingness to cooperate” by finding their “own path to pragmatism” and avoiding the “forensic gamesmanship” which had led to the parallel proceedings in England and Singapore.
Insights
Feb 25, 2026
Service out: alternative methods, 'technical games' and exceptional circumstances
Insights
Oct 30, 2025
Are Third Parties excluded from Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses?
Insights
Sep 02, 2025
Better to ask for Forgiveness than (Court) Permission? “Service out” and the CPR 6.33(2B) Gateways
Insights
Aug 14, 2025
Navigating Liability for Dishonest Assistance: An Account of Profit, Loss and Constructive Trusts

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • M&A deals that deliver
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
  • Legal notices
  • Privacy notice
  • Modern Slavery Act
  • Cookie policy
  • UK Transparency Rules
  • Tax Information
  • Media inquiries
Icon: linkedin

© 2026 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP