Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Fiona Boyle

Fiona Boyle
  1. People /

Fiona Boyle

Fiona Boyle

Associate


London
Fiona Boyle
  1. People /

Fiona Boyle

Fiona Boyle

Associate


London

Fiona Boyle

Associate

London

T: +44 (0) 20 3400 4281

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

Biography

Fiona is an associate in the firm's Business and Commercial Disputes department. Fiona advises a variety of clients from financial institutions to individuals and deals with a wide range of general commercial and contractual disputes, as well as regulatory matters. Fiona has experience of working with global clients, particularly from Asia, having undertaken a secondment to the Firm's Singapore office for six months. Fiona is also a qualified advocate having obtained the Civil Higher Rights qualification.

The Growth of Class Actions: What’s next?

The Growth of Class Actions: What’s next?

We explore the rapidly changing legal landscape

A new regular series of updates on the world of class actions and mass claims A new regular series of updates on the world of class actions and mass claims

Admissions

  • England and Wales

Related Capabilities

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Government Contracts & Public Procurement Government Contracts & Public Procurement

Regulation, Compliance & Advisory Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Government Contracts & Public Procurement

  • Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

Related Insights

Insights
Sep 01, 2025

Anti-Enforcement Injunctions: a tool to restrain the enforcement of an English Court order or judgment

It is well established that an anti-enforcement injunction is available as an equitable remedy in the English Courts to restrain a party from enforcing a foreign court order or foreign judgment. Relying on those principles, BCLP obtained an anti-enforcement injunction on behalf of its clients to restrain the enforcement of an English Court judgment and order which is understood to be the first reported case of its kind: Federal Government of Nigeria & Anor v Louis Emovbira Williams [2025] EWHC 2217 (Comm).
Insights
May 19, 2025

Is challenging a judgment allegedly procured by a previously known fraud an abuse of process and vexatious?

“Once a judgment is tainted by deceit it is fatally flawed” (Park v CNH Industrial Capital Europe Limited). But can an application to set aside a default judgment allegedly procured by fraud, itself be an abuse of process, vexatious and a collateral attack on a previous judgment of the court? We explore this question in the context of the claimant having previously known about the alleged fraud, in Henshaw J’s judgment of 8 May 2025 in (1) Federal Government of Nigeria; and (2) Attorney General of the Federal Republic of Nigeria v Williams.
News
Feb 15, 2023

BCLP recognized in ‘The Lawyer’ Top 20 Cases of 2023

Insights
Jun 17, 2022

Court of Appeal dismisses banks’ applications for permission to appeal – Vatche Manoukian v Societe Generale De Banque Au Liban S.A.L and Bank Audi S.A.L

Following the first ever merits judgment on international banking transfer rights under Lebanese law, in which the high court ordered specific performance against two Lebanese banks in favour of our client, Vatche Manoukian, the Court of Appeal has now dismissed the banks’ applications for permission to appeal.
Insights
Mar 25, 2022

High Court hands down first ever merits judgment on international banking transfer rights under Lebanese law – Vatche Manoukian v Société Générale De Banque Au Liban S.A.L and Bank Audi S.A.L

Following the recent decision of the High Court, in which specific performance was ordered against two Lebanese banks in favour of our client, Vatche Manoukian, the Court has now handed down its fully reasoned judgment. The judgment in favour of our client is groundbreaking in being the first full merits judgment in any jurisdiction on the international transfer rights of banking customers under Lebanese law. That issue is likely to be of very real interest to all customers of Lebanese banks, but particularly those who can bring claims in the UK or EU under consumer legislation. The High Court considered whether two Lebanese banks in this case had an obligation to effect the international bank transfer requested by our client, Mr Manoukian. The Court interpreted the terms and conditions of the two banks in accordance with Lebanese law, and considered the impact of custom on the contracts with banks. In finding in favour of our client, the Court held that Mr Manoukian had a right to an international transfer, thus being entitled to an order for specific performance. That finding was based both on the terms of the contracts but also the wider issue of Lebanese banking custom which is incorporated into contracts under the Lebanese civil code. Written by Graham Shear, partner, Andrew Street, senior associate and Irina Tuca, trainee solicitor at Bryan Cave Leighton Pasiner LLP and first published on 25 March 2022. Vatche Manoukian v Société Générale De Banque Au Liban S.A.L and Bank Audi S.A.L
News
Feb 28, 2022

Client wins case for transfer of money deposited with Lebanese banks

In the case of Vatche Manoukian v Société Générale De Banque Au Liban and Bank Audi, BCLP’s client, Vatche Manoukian, has succeeded in obtaining an order for payment of international transfers from his bank accounts held with the defendants, who are two of the largest banks in Lebanon. 

Related Insights

Insights
Sep 01, 2025
Anti-Enforcement Injunctions: a tool to restrain the enforcement of an English Court order or judgment
It is well established that an anti-enforcement injunction is available as an equitable remedy in the English Courts to restrain a party from enforcing a foreign court order or foreign judgment. Relying on those principles, BCLP obtained an anti-enforcement injunction on behalf of its clients to restrain the enforcement of an English Court judgment and order which is understood to be the first reported case of its kind: Federal Government of Nigeria & Anor v Louis Emovbira Williams [2025] EWHC 2217 (Comm).
Insights
May 19, 2025
Is challenging a judgment allegedly procured by a previously known fraud an abuse of process and vexatious?
“Once a judgment is tainted by deceit it is fatally flawed” (Park v CNH Industrial Capital Europe Limited). But can an application to set aside a default judgment allegedly procured by fraud, itself be an abuse of process, vexatious and a collateral attack on a previous judgment of the court? We explore this question in the context of the claimant having previously known about the alleged fraud, in Henshaw J’s judgment of 8 May 2025 in (1) Federal Government of Nigeria; and (2) Attorney General of the Federal Republic of Nigeria v Williams.
News
Feb 15, 2023
BCLP recognized in ‘The Lawyer’ Top 20 Cases of 2023
Insights
Jun 17, 2022
Court of Appeal dismisses banks’ applications for permission to appeal – Vatche Manoukian v Societe Generale De Banque Au Liban S.A.L and Bank Audi S.A.L
Following the first ever merits judgment on international banking transfer rights under Lebanese law, in which the high court ordered specific performance against two Lebanese banks in favour of our client, Vatche Manoukian, the Court of Appeal has now dismissed the banks’ applications for permission to appeal.
Insights
Mar 25, 2022
High Court hands down first ever merits judgment on international banking transfer rights under Lebanese law – Vatche Manoukian v Société Générale De Banque Au Liban S.A.L and Bank Audi S.A.L
Following the recent decision of the High Court, in which specific performance was ordered against two Lebanese banks in favour of our client, Vatche Manoukian, the Court has now handed down its fully reasoned judgment. The judgment in favour of our client is groundbreaking in being the first full merits judgment in any jurisdiction on the international transfer rights of banking customers under Lebanese law. That issue is likely to be of very real interest to all customers of Lebanese banks, but particularly those who can bring claims in the UK or EU under consumer legislation. The High Court considered whether two Lebanese banks in this case had an obligation to effect the international bank transfer requested by our client, Mr Manoukian. The Court interpreted the terms and conditions of the two banks in accordance with Lebanese law, and considered the impact of custom on the contracts with banks. In finding in favour of our client, the Court held that Mr Manoukian had a right to an international transfer, thus being entitled to an order for specific performance. That finding was based both on the terms of the contracts but also the wider issue of Lebanese banking custom which is incorporated into contracts under the Lebanese civil code. Written by Graham Shear, partner, Andrew Street, senior associate and Irina Tuca, trainee solicitor at Bryan Cave Leighton Pasiner LLP and first published on 25 March 2022. Vatche Manoukian v Société Générale De Banque Au Liban S.A.L and Bank Audi S.A.L
News
Feb 28, 2022
Client wins case for transfer of money deposited with Lebanese banks
In the case of Vatche Manoukian v Société Générale De Banque Au Liban and Bank Audi, BCLP’s client, Vatche Manoukian, has succeeded in obtaining an order for payment of international transfers from his bank accounts held with the defendants, who are two of the largest banks in Lebanon. 
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP