Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Emerging Themes 2026Getting Deals DoneThe Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Joanna Munro

Joanna Munro
  1. People

Joanna Munro

Joanna Munro

Senior Associate


London
Joanna Munro
  1. People

Joanna Munro

Joanna Munro

Senior Associate


London

Joanna Munro

Senior Associate

London

T: +44 (0) 20 3400 4912

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

Biography

Joanna is experienced in financial services law and regulation.

From 2016 to 2021, Joanna worked in the Enforcement, General Counsel and Supervision divisions at the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). In Enforcement, she was involved in a range of regulatory and wholesale investigations, conducted litigation proceedings on behalf of the FCA before the High Court and the Upper Tribunal as well as advised on contested authorisation applications and urgent supervisory interventions. She also took cases before the FCA’s decision-making bodies. Joanna’s experience includes investigating instances of insider-dealing and pension mis-selling, reviewing compliance with AML requirements, taking action for violations of the general prohibition and financial promotion rules and advising on fitness and propriety assessments in relation to senior managers.

Prior to joining the FCA, Joanna worked in the legal team of a Forex broker and at the European Commission in the department responsible for the EU’s policies on banking and finance.

Emerging Themes in Financial Regulation & Disputes

We anticipate a pivotal year for investigations and enforcement

Our 2026 forecastIcon: arrow

Spoken Languages

  • Polish
  • French

Admissions

  • England and Wales

Education

  • University of London-King's College, LL.B., 2013

Related Capabilities

Special Investigations Special Investigations

Financial Institutions Financial Institutions

White Collar White Collar

Finance Finance

Investigations Investigations

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Regulation, Compliance & Advisory Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

  • Special Investigations

  • Financial Institutions

  • White Collar

  • Finance

  • Investigations

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

Related Insights

View All Related InsightsIcon: arrow

Insights
Jan 26, 2026

From incentives to implications - navigating Early Account Schemes in a multi-regulator world

The UK regulatory landscape is evolving towards more subject-led enforcement models designed to accelerate investigations and deliver swifter outcomes. Early Account Schemes (EAS), implemented by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and now contemplated by the Office for Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), allow firms to self-investigate and report misconduct in exchange for the opportunity of enhanced settlement discounts, quicker resolution, and greater visibility and control over the process. While an EAS scheme offers clear benefits, it also raises complex legal and strategic considerations – particularly for financial sector firms facing overlapping regulatory regimes, where a single issue may trigger scrutiny from multiple regulators. Navigating overlapping regulatory regimes requires careful consideration and planning. Choosing to cooperate through an EAS scheme may present additional challenges and risks, particularly where an alleged sanctions breach could expose the firm to potential criminal liability.
News
May 09, 2025

BCLP advises iFOREX on potential IPO

Insights
Jan 30, 2025

AI and machine learning in financial crime compliance

Insights
Mar 12, 2024

Caught in the crosshairs

How the PRA’s new Early Account Scheme impacts individuals
Insights
Jan 18, 2024

How scam-proof are you in the new world of mandatory reimbursement for APP fraud?

Insights
Jan 18, 2024

Paved with good intentions? The future of the Consumer Duty

Insights
Jul 13, 2023

Supreme Court narrows the scope of the Quincecare duty in Philipp v Barclays Bank

We are defending financial institutions from multiple claims for breach of the so called Quincecare duty and have seen claimant law firms increasingly seek to expand the scope of the duty to try to make financial institutions liable for any frauds taking place through their accounts. Where a bank is unknowingly or innocently “mixed up” in a fraud as a result of duly complying with the customer’s instructions (who are not themselves complicit in or aware of the fraud), the question is in what circumstances should the bank be held liable for any loss suffered on the basis of its purported greater ability to detect fraud. The answer to this question, eagerly awaited by many, has finally come from the Supreme Court in its judgment in Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC [2023] UKSC 25.
News
May 22, 2023

BCLP delivers 2023 senior managers development program for the Association of Foreign Banks (AFB)

Insights
Jan 19, 2023

Authorised Push Payment fraud – the return of the nanny state?

Related Insights

Insights
Jan 26, 2026
From incentives to implications - navigating Early Account Schemes in a multi-regulator world
The UK regulatory landscape is evolving towards more subject-led enforcement models designed to accelerate investigations and deliver swifter outcomes. Early Account Schemes (EAS), implemented by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and now contemplated by the Office for Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), allow firms to self-investigate and report misconduct in exchange for the opportunity of enhanced settlement discounts, quicker resolution, and greater visibility and control over the process. While an EAS scheme offers clear benefits, it also raises complex legal and strategic considerations – particularly for financial sector firms facing overlapping regulatory regimes, where a single issue may trigger scrutiny from multiple regulators. Navigating overlapping regulatory regimes requires careful consideration and planning. Choosing to cooperate through an EAS scheme may present additional challenges and risks, particularly where an alleged sanctions breach could expose the firm to potential criminal liability.
News
May 09, 2025
BCLP advises iFOREX on potential IPO
Insights
Jan 30, 2025
AI and machine learning in financial crime compliance
Insights
Mar 12, 2024
Caught in the crosshairs
How the PRA’s new Early Account Scheme impacts individuals
Insights
Jan 18, 2024
How scam-proof are you in the new world of mandatory reimbursement for APP fraud?
Insights
Jan 18, 2024
Paved with good intentions? The future of the Consumer Duty
Insights
Jul 13, 2023
Supreme Court narrows the scope of the Quincecare duty in Philipp v Barclays Bank
We are defending financial institutions from multiple claims for breach of the so called Quincecare duty and have seen claimant law firms increasingly seek to expand the scope of the duty to try to make financial institutions liable for any frauds taking place through their accounts. Where a bank is unknowingly or innocently “mixed up” in a fraud as a result of duly complying with the customer’s instructions (who are not themselves complicit in or aware of the fraud), the question is in what circumstances should the bank be held liable for any loss suffered on the basis of its purported greater ability to detect fraud. The answer to this question, eagerly awaited by many, has finally come from the Supreme Court in its judgment in Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC [2023] UKSC 25.
News
May 22, 2023
BCLP delivers 2023 senior managers development program for the Association of Foreign Banks (AFB)
Insights
Jan 19, 2023
Authorised Push Payment fraud – the return of the nanny state?
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
  • Legal notices
  • Privacy notice
  • Modern Slavery Act
  • Cookie policy
  • UK Transparency Rules
  • Media inquiries
Icon: linkedin

© 2026 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP