Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Jonathan G. Fetterly

Jonathan G. Fetterly
  1. People /

Jonathan G. Fetterly

Jonathan G. Fetterly

Partner


San Francisco
Jonathan G. Fetterly
  1. People /

Jonathan G. Fetterly

Jonathan G. Fetterly

Partner


San Francisco

Jonathan G. Fetterly

Partner

San Francisco

T: +1 415 675 3451

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

  • Experience

Biography

Jon Fetterly is an experienced litigator whose practice focuses on First Amendment litigation and commercial disputes. He serves as trial counsel for a national media company fighting in federal trial and appellate courts across the country for the right of the press and public to access court records. He also has experience enforcing statutory public records requests, responding to subpoenas, defending defamation and libel claims, and bringing anti-SLAPP motions.

In addition to his First Amendment and media law practice, Jon has a wide range of commercial litigation experience involving commercial transactions, shareholder disputes, government contracts and retail banking. His financial services litigation practice focuses on bank operations and customer disputes including fraud, unauthorized payments and other issues involving deposit accounts, negotiable instruments and credit products.

Early in his practice, Jon represented the Recording Industry Association of America in connection with the recording industry’s nationwide litigation against those who illegally distributed copyrighted sound recordings through file-sharing programs. In this capacity, he successfully prosecuted numerous copyright actions throughout the federal district courts of California.

 

Admissions

  • California, 2003

Education

University of California, Hastings College of Law, J.D., 2003

California State University, magna cum laude, B.A., 2000

Related Capabilities

Regulation Regulation

Media & First Amendment Media & First Amendment

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Business Speech Business Speech

Financial Services Financial Services

Consumer Finance Disputes Consumer Finance Disputes

Enforcement Enforcement

Litigation Litigation

Financial Services Corporate & Regulatory Team Financial Services Corporate & Regulatory Team

Corporate Corporate

Finance Finance

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Funds Finance Funds Finance

Workouts & Financial Restructuring Workouts & Financial Restructuring

Wealth Management Wealth Management

Subchapter S Subchapter S

Going Private Going Private

Community Banking Litigation Community Banking Litigation

De Novo Banking De Novo Banking

Financial Institutions Financial Institutions

Regulation Regulation

Media & First Amendment Media & First Amendment

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Business Speech Business Speech

Financial Services Financial Services

Consumer Finance Disputes Consumer Finance Disputes

Enforcement Enforcement

Litigation Litigation

Financial Services Corporate & Regulatory Team Financial Services Corporate & Regulatory Team

Corporate Corporate

Finance Finance

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Funds Finance Funds Finance

Workouts & Financial Restructuring Workouts & Financial Restructuring

Wealth Management Wealth Management

Subchapter S Subchapter S

Going Private Going Private

Community Banking Litigation Community Banking Litigation

De Novo Banking De Novo Banking

Financial Institutions Financial Institutions

Regulation Regulation

Media & First Amendment Media & First Amendment

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Business Speech

  • Financial Services

  • Consumer Finance Disputes

  • Enforcement

  • Litigation

  • Financial Services Corporate & Regulatory Team

  • Corporate

  • Finance

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Funds Finance

  • Workouts & Financial Restructuring

  • Wealth Management

  • Subchapter S

  • Going Private

  • Community Banking Litigation

  • De Novo Banking

  • Financial Institutions

  • Regulation

  • Media & First Amendment

Experience

  • Represented publisher in successful First Amendment challenge to California Superior Court’s policy restricting access to newly-filed civil complaints, resulting in permanent injunction prohibiting access restriction. Courthouse News Serv. v. Planet, 2016 WL 9711185 (C.D. Cal. 2016), aff’d 947 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2020).
  • Successfully argued appeal affirming trial court order rejecting abstention defense to publisher’s First Amendment claim and making key determination on when First Amendment right of access attaches to new civil complaints. Courthouse News Serv. v. New Mexico AOC, 53 F.4th 1245 (10th Cir. 2022).
  • Secured dismissal of claims brought against foreign national defendants in California state court in connection with foreign transaction by successfully arguing the Act of State doctrine precluded judicial assessment of a foreign government’s official acts. New Peking Buffet, Inc. v. Sheng Li Lin, No. B258842, 2016 WL 865361, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 7, 2016).
  • Secured successful resolution of shareholder dispute on behalf of majority owner of limited liability company facing challenge and removal by minority owners after company secured lucrative utilities contract.
  • Represented prominent public figure in connection with successful anti-SLAPP motion in California state court.
  • Won summary judgment on behalf of national bank in case involving claims based on alleged wrongful dishonor of checks drawn against deposited funds properly held by bank pursuant to federal regulations.
  • Won summary adjudication on behalf of national bank in bookkeeper embezzlement case by successfully invoking statutory claim preclusion under UCC UCC § 4406.
  • Successfully moved to dismiss counter-claims asserted against record companies in copyright infringement case arising from use of peer-to-peer file sharing network. Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Serrano, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95203 (S.D. Cal. 2007).

Related Insights

News
Aug 14, 2025

A Look Into Litigation Funding

As litigation funding has drawn national headlines in recent years in connection with cases such as the Gawker and Smartmatic defamation actions, it has also received additional scrutiny from courts and judges interested in knowing who is or may be influencing the litigation in their courtrooms. Party litigants may likewise want to know who is funding their litigation opponent.This paper by BCLP Partner Jon Fetterly explores the emergence of local rules and court orders requiring disclosure of litigation funding arrangements, and the growing body of case law addressing when litigation funding is potentially relevant and discoverable. It also considers whether documents and communications shared with a non-party funder can be protected from discovery on the grounds that they are privileged and confidential. The authorities examined in this paper potentially apply to any case in which a party is funded by a non-party to the litigation, regardless of whether the funding supports the prosecution of a plaintiff’s claim or provides a defense to a person or group in need of counsel. 
News
Jul 01, 2021

Courthouse News Team Wins Victory in Fourth Circuit

News
Jul 15, 2020

BCLP Secures String of Victories in Courthouse News Service Challenges to Delays in Court Record Access

News
Jan 23, 2020

Courthouse News Team in ‘Law360’ on Court Ruling

Related Insights

News
Aug 14, 2025
A Look Into Litigation Funding
As litigation funding has drawn national headlines in recent years in connection with cases such as the Gawker and Smartmatic defamation actions, it has also received additional scrutiny from courts and judges interested in knowing who is or may be influencing the litigation in their courtrooms. Party litigants may likewise want to know who is funding their litigation opponent.This paper by BCLP Partner Jon Fetterly explores the emergence of local rules and court orders requiring disclosure of litigation funding arrangements, and the growing body of case law addressing when litigation funding is potentially relevant and discoverable. It also considers whether documents and communications shared with a non-party funder can be protected from discovery on the grounds that they are privileged and confidential. The authorities examined in this paper potentially apply to any case in which a party is funded by a non-party to the litigation, regardless of whether the funding supports the prosecution of a plaintiff’s claim or provides a defense to a person or group in need of counsel. 
News
Jul 01, 2021
Courthouse News Team Wins Victory in Fourth Circuit
News
Jul 15, 2020
BCLP Secures String of Victories in Courthouse News Service Challenges to Delays in Court Record Access
News
Jan 23, 2020
Courthouse News Team in ‘Law360’ on Court Ruling
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP