Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Michael P. Carey

Michael P. Carey
  1. People /

Michael P. Carey

Michael P. Carey

Counsel


Atlanta
Michael P. Carey
  1. People /

Michael P. Carey

Michael P. Carey

Counsel


Atlanta

Michael P. Carey

Counsel

Atlanta

T: +1 404 572 6863

LinkedInLinkedIn
VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

  • Experience

  • Resources

Biography

Mike Carey practices in the firm’s Class Actions Group with a focus on director and officer liability, securities litigation, M&A litigation, ERISA litigation, and other complex litigation. He frequently advises public and private corporations and their directors and officers in matters involving federal and state securities laws, corporate governance, executive compensation, employee benefit plans, and major transactions. His clients also include banks and trust companies, broker-dealers and investment advisers, focusing on regulatory compliance issues and disputes involving professional liability and fiduciary duties. Mike has broad experience litigating cases in state and federal courts around the country, conducting internal investigations, and representing clients in government investigations and enforcement actions.

Mike’s practice includes a strong focus on federal and state corporate disclosure requirements. He has successfully defended clients against class actions and complex litigation asserting fraud under the federal securities laws as well as state “blue sky” laws. He has extensive experience in cases involving public company mergers, including both pre-closing merger challenge suits and post-closing litigation involving breaches of representations and warranties. Mike also has broad experience in matters involving employee stock plans and retirement plans, having represented ERISA fiduciaries and service providers in disputes involving plan administration, investment selection, monitoring and oversight, professional liability, and fraud. 

In addition to his litigation practice, Mike advises corporations and financial institutions and their directors and officers on issues involving D&O insurance and indemnification, including assessment of coverage, advice with respect to reporting claims, and review of indemnification rights granted in corporate articles and bylaws. He also advises companies and their boards as to general corporate governance matters such as the fiduciary duties owed by directors and officers, and disclosure obligations under federal and state law.

Mike has written extensively on litigation issues affecting Georgia corporations and their directors and officers. He publishes an annual survey of corporate and business organization decisions handed down by the Georgia Supreme Court, Georgia Court of Appeals, Fulton County Business Court and Georgia federal courts, and is the co-author of the Director and Officer Liability chapter of Georgia Business Litigation. He is a frequent speaker on matters involving Georgia corporate litigation. In addition, he serves on the Corporate Code Committee of the Georgia Bar’s Business Law Section. 

Professional Affiliations

  • American Bar Association, Business Law and Litigation Sections
  • Atlanta Bar Association, Litigation Section
  • Georgia Bar Association, Business Law and Litigation Sections

Admissions

  • Georgia, 2000

Education

Duke University, J.D., 2000

Duke University, B.A., 1996

Related Capabilities

Consumer Fraud Consumer Fraud

ERISA & ESOP ERISA & ESOP

Insurance (Class Actions) Insurance (Class Actions)

Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions) Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions)

Class Actions Class Actions

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Securities Litigation and Enforcement Securities Litigation and Enforcement

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Class Actions & Mass Torts Class Actions & Mass Torts

Antitrust Class Actions Antitrust Class Actions

Shareholder Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions Shareholder Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions

Food, Ag & Nutrition (Class Actions) Food, Ag & Nutrition (Class Actions)

Employment Class & Collective Actions Employment Class & Collective Actions

Sports (Class Actions) Sports (Class Actions)

Data Privacy, Telecommunications & Collections Data Privacy, Telecommunications & Collections

Environmental and Toxic Tort Environmental and Toxic Tort

Financial Services Financial Services

Consumer Fraud Consumer Fraud

ERISA & ESOP ERISA & ESOP

Insurance (Class Actions) Insurance (Class Actions)

Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions) Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions)

Class Actions Class Actions

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Securities Litigation and Enforcement Securities Litigation and Enforcement

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Class Actions & Mass Torts Class Actions & Mass Torts

Antitrust Class Actions Antitrust Class Actions

Shareholder Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions Shareholder Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions

Food, Ag & Nutrition (Class Actions) Food, Ag & Nutrition (Class Actions)

Employment Class & Collective Actions Employment Class & Collective Actions

Sports (Class Actions) Sports (Class Actions)

Data Privacy, Telecommunications & Collections Data Privacy, Telecommunications & Collections

Environmental and Toxic Tort Environmental and Toxic Tort

Financial Services Financial Services

Consumer Fraud Consumer Fraud

ERISA & ESOP ERISA & ESOP

Insurance (Class Actions) Insurance (Class Actions)

Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions) Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions)

Class Actions Class Actions

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Securities Litigation and Enforcement Securities Litigation and Enforcement

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Class Actions & Mass Torts

  • Antitrust Class Actions

  • Shareholder Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions

  • Food, Ag & Nutrition (Class Actions)

  • Employment Class & Collective Actions

  • Sports (Class Actions)

  • Data Privacy, Telecommunications & Collections

  • Environmental and Toxic Tort

  • Financial Services

  • Consumer Fraud

  • ERISA & ESOP

  • Insurance (Class Actions)

  • Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions)

  • Class Actions

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Securities Litigation and Enforcement

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Experience

  • Represented the former independent directors of a large energy company in securities litigation, shareholder derivative litigation and government investigations arising from allegations of fraudulent misrepresentations and material omissions in the company’s public filings
  • Represented numerous sponsors and fiduciaries of ERISA-qualified retirement plans in “excessive fee” class actions challenging the plan’s investment decisions and monitoring of plan expenses
  • Defended the former majority shareholder and two officers of an ESOP-owned company against breach of fiduciary duty claims brought by the ESOP’s participants
  • Represented the custodian of a multiple employer retirement plan in litigation arising from the plan trustee’s misappropriation of plan assets
  • Defended a multinational pharmaceutical company and its CEO and CFO against securities fraud claims brought by a large shareholder
  • Represented numerous public companies and their boards of directors in litigation challenging major corporate transactions and related public disclosures

Resources

Publications

  • Georgia Business Litigation, Port, co-author of Chapter 1, “Director and Officer Liability” (ALM, 2020 ed.). Contributor since the publication’s inception in 2014
  • “Recent Developments in Officer and Director Litigation,” Carolina Banker, Winter 2014
  • “Georgia Corporation and Business Organization Case Law Developments,” Georgia Bar Journal. Annual contributor since 2014

Speaking Engagements

  • Program Chair and Speaker, “Georgia Business Law Institute,” Georgia ICLE, October 2019
  • "Recent Georgia Corporate and Business Organization Case Law Developments," Fulton County Business Court, Atlanta, GA, February 2016

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 20, 2025

Closing the Gap: Health and Welfare Compliance

News
Apr 05, 2022

BCLP Team Advises Neenah, Inc., in $3B Merger of Equals

Insights
Jun 25, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court: Courts Must Consider Generic Nature of Statements in Weighing Certification of Securities Class Action, but Defendants Bear Burden in Rebutting Price Impact

In a closely followed case concerning class certification in securities fraud class actions, the U. S. Supreme Court has held that the generic nature of a company’s statements should be considered in determining whether such statements had an impact on the company’s stock price.  The Court also held that in opposing class certification, a securities fraud defendant bears the burden of showing that an alleged misstatement had no effect on the company’s stock price. 

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 20, 2025
Closing the Gap: Health and Welfare Compliance
News
Apr 05, 2022
BCLP Team Advises Neenah, Inc., in $3B Merger of Equals
Insights
Jun 25, 2021
U.S. Supreme Court: Courts Must Consider Generic Nature of Statements in Weighing Certification of Securities Class Action, but Defendants Bear Burden in Rebutting Price Impact
In a closely followed case concerning class certification in securities fraud class actions, the U. S. Supreme Court has held that the generic nature of a company’s statements should be considered in determining whether such statements had an impact on the company’s stock price.  The Court also held that in opposing class certification, a securities fraud defendant bears the burden of showing that an alleged misstatement had no effect on the company’s stock price. 
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP