Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Peter Gao

Peter Gao
  1. People /

Peter Gao

Peter Gao

Associate


Phoenix
Peter Gao
  1. People /

Peter Gao

Peter Gao

Associate


Phoenix

Peter Gao

Associate

Phoenix

T: +1 602 364 7071

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

  • Resources

Biography

Peter Gao is an intellectual property attorney who focuses on domestic and international patent prosecution, litigation, and licensing matters. He provides strategic counseling from startups to Fortune 100 companies in all areas of technology, often filing applications with freedom to operate and clearance considerations to strengthen the position of the system or method against infringement. Peter’s experience includes working with mobile devices, displays, augmented and virtual reality devices, semiconductors and hardware, medical devices, and complex software including AI/ML. He is often credited in successfully navigating through USPTO examiner considerations and managing office actions for 101, 102, and 103 rejections.

Prior to BCLP, Peter worked as an automation engineer intern at Intel and was an intellectual property intern with microLED platform designer Compound Photonics. He is an active member of American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) as well as the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA).

Professional Affiliations

  • Member, American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), 2024 - present 
  • Member, National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA), 2022 - present 

Spoken Languages

  • Chinese (Mandarin)

Admissions

  • Arizona, 2024
  • California, 2023

Education

  • Arizona State University, J.D., 2023
  • Arizona State University, B.S.E., 2019

Related Capabilities

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Regulation, Compliance & Advisory Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

Class Actions & Mass Torts Class Actions & Mass Torts

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

  • Class Actions & Mass Torts

Resources

Publications

  • "Federal Circuit ruling further narrows the printed matter doctrine," The Patent Lawyer, 2025

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 11, 2025

Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Prosecution Disclaimer in Patent Families

In Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc., 131 F.4th 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2025), the Federal Circuit addressed whether the prosecution history of one patent in a patent family can limit the scope of claims in a different patent in that same patent family, when the claim terms in the two patents are similar but not the same.
News
Jan 14, 2025

Rethinking Patent Doctrine in Tech: Peter Gao, George Chen, and Cory Smith Published in The Patent Lawyer 2025

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 11, 2025
Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Prosecution Disclaimer in Patent Families
In Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc., 131 F.4th 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2025), the Federal Circuit addressed whether the prosecution history of one patent in a patent family can limit the scope of claims in a different patent in that same patent family, when the claim terms in the two patents are similar but not the same.
News
Jan 14, 2025
Rethinking Patent Doctrine in Tech: Peter Gao, George Chen, and Cory Smith Published in The Patent Lawyer 2025
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP