Yana Britan Tanck

  1. People /

Yana Britan Tanck

Yana Britan Tanck

Associate

  1. People /

Yana Britan Tanck

Yana Britan Tanck

Associate

Yana Britan Tanck

Associate

New York

T: +1 212 541 2080

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Biography

Yana is an associate in the firm’s M&A and Corporate Finance Practice Group. Her practice focuses on negotiating and drafting the primary and ancillary contracts, researching and resolving issues relating to complex transactional matters, interfacing with tax, employment, real estate and other legal specialists, coordinating work with international counsel and generally assisting on managing transactions on a day-to-day basis.

Prior to joining the firm, she advised clients on corporate and transactional matters, as well as represented clients in complex commercial litigation in New York and Delaware.

Yana received her J.D. from Saratov State Academy of Law where she graduated summa cum laude, and was a member of the law school’s Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court team and the President of the European Law Student Association. She also received her Master of Laws from Duke University School of Law, with a concentration on Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, Capital Markets, Mergers and Acquisitions and Structured Finance.

The Corporate Transparency Act

The Corporate Transparency Act

CTA resource page

Use our resource page to keep up to date on FAQs, events, and analysis & insights on the Corporate Transparency Act.

Read more 

CTA compliance tool

Many businesses are wondering if they need to comply with the CTA, and if so, whose data they may need to gather and when it should be first submitted and updated. Use our interactive CTA compliance tool to learn more about the nuts and bolts of the CTA.

Explore the tool 

Spoken Languages

  • Russian
  • English

Admissions

  • New York, 2014
  • Russian Federation
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Education

  • Duke University, LL.M., 2012
  • Saratov State Academy of Law, J.D., summa cum laude, 2009

Related Practice Areas

  • M&A & Corporate Finance

  • Corporate

Experience

Corporate and Transactional Work

  • Represented a 50% shareholder of TransPerfect Global, Inc., a large international translation and language services company, in connection with an auction for the remaining 50% of shares of the company.
  • Advised a major global provider of telecommunication services in connection with the proposed merger structure, assisted on negotiating a LOI with another telecommunication company.
  • Advised a large foreign manufacturing company in connection with a joint venture with a U.S. entity with the purpose of developing a U.S. manufacturing and sales presence.
  • Advised TransPerfect Global, Inc. on various corporate matters, including setting up subsidiary companies in new jurisdictions, preparing formation and other governing documents, advising on issues relating to employment contracts, software development contracts and master service agreements.
  • Represented ExactPro Systems LLC, an international software company with a presence in the U.S., U.K. and CIS, in connection with the sale of 100% of its shares to the London Stock Exchange Group.
  • Represented Raven Russia Ltd., a major listed property investment company, in connection with a proposed multi-million dollar acquisition of a large commercial warehouse facility in Russia.
  • Advised UFG Private Equity in connection with the proposed sale-leaseback transaction related to a large number of infrastructure telecommunication towers in Kazakhstan and Russia owned by a major Russian telecommunication company.
  • Advised AIG in connection with its intercompany loan restructuring and subsequent liquidation of its subsidiary company in Russia.
  • Advised a 50% shareholder in the Real Estate Development Joint Venture on its exit strategies under its Joint Venture Agreement with another shareholder and possible return of its investment in the amount of $20 million.
  • Represented a major foreign investor in connection with a proposed $25 million sale of his shareholdings in a joint venture to the other shareholder of the joint venture.
  • Advised a U.S. private equity fund concentrating on the real estate, energy and technology sectors in connection with a real estate development project in New York City.
  • Represented an Italian construction company in negotiating and drafting various commercial contracts with their sub-contractors and clients in the U.S.
  • Advised Deutsche Bank AG in connection with its Russian subsidiary’s corporate matters.

Corporate Governance and Commercial Litigation

  • Represented several major shareholders of TransPerfect Global Inc. in various disputes arising out of a court ordered sale of a company, including an alleged violation of the shareholders’ constitutional rights by the court appointed custodian and enforcement of the securities purchase agreement against the selling shareholder.
  • Represented a shareholder of a company in JAMS Commercial Arbitration Tribunal in a dispute arising out of an alleged breach of the engagement agreement entered between the shareholder and his financial advisor in connection with a proposed stalking horse transaction.
  • Represented a company in a derivative action against its director’s advisors that were engaged in an alleged aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, mismanagement and waste of corporate assets.
  • Represented an offshore BVI company in a dispute arising out of an alleged security fraud, conversion of escrow funds and breach of fiduciary duty by its former advisors.
  • Represented a company in state and federal actions arising out of disputes with former employees seeking an alleged promised of securities in the company, unpaid compensation and other damages.
  • Represented an entertainment and production company and a former talent manager in a dispute arising out of an alleged breach of a management contract and unpaid commissions by a world renowned pop musician.
  • Represented a New York trust in an action in federal court against allegations of international money laundering and unjust enrichment brought by creditors of a Russian bank undergoing a bankruptcy proceeding.
  • Defended several limited liability companies of Ginza Group, a well-known international restaurant chain, in a number of state actions along with an ICC arbitration arising out of an alleged violation of an investment contract and an alleged breach of fiduciary duty by the company’s managers.
  • Represented a well-known New York City restaurant on appeal from the order of the New York Supreme Court granting a motion for summary judgment in favour of the restaurant and against the restaurant’s former managers for breach of fiduciary duties and misappropriation of approximately $3.7 million.
  • Represented an officer and director of a company in a state action sounding in malicious prosecution and violation of judiciary law; “second chaired” to Professor Allan Dershowitz on the same dispute in the New York Appellate Division, First Department.

Related Insights

Insights
Jan 29, 2024

Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act maze: hidden pitfalls of employee structuring for the large operating company exemption

*A significant point of consideration for larger, privately held companies lies in the structuring of their employee base. Many companies opt for a structure where all employees are retained in a separate subsidiary or subsidiaries for various operational reasons, including tax benefits and employment-related efficiencies. However, under the CTA, this common practice could inadvertently expose companies to reporting requirements.With the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) now in effect, it is crucial for privately held mid-sized and large companies to look into and re-examine their corporate structures to ensure compliance with the new law. While the CTA primarily targets smaller companies in lightly regulated industries, larger companies should not automatically assume they and all of their affiliates are exempt from its reporting requirements. This is particularly true for those using common employee structures where employees are retained in separate subsidiaries or affiliates of a holding or operating company of the business. Such structures could inadvertently place the holding and operating companies, as well as their subsidiaries, under the ambit of CTA’s reporting requirements, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review of such businesses’ corporate and employment structures to ensure full compliance with the CTA. We will discuss the employee prong of the “large operating company” exemption in more detail below, with examples of how an organization’s structure might affect the analysis.

Related Insights

Insights
Apr 25, 2024
FinCEN updates CTA FAQs for the first time in three months
Insights
Jan 29, 2024
Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act maze: hidden pitfalls of employee structuring for the large operating company exemption
*A significant point of consideration for larger, privately held companies lies in the structuring of their employee base. Many companies opt for a structure where all employees are retained in a separate subsidiary or subsidiaries for various operational reasons, including tax benefits and employment-related efficiencies. However, under the CTA, this common practice could inadvertently expose companies to reporting requirements.With the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) now in effect, it is crucial for privately held mid-sized and large companies to look into and re-examine their corporate structures to ensure compliance with the new law. While the CTA primarily targets smaller companies in lightly regulated industries, larger companies should not automatically assume they and all of their affiliates are exempt from its reporting requirements. This is particularly true for those using common employee structures where employees are retained in separate subsidiaries or affiliates of a holding or operating company of the business. Such structures could inadvertently place the holding and operating companies, as well as their subsidiaries, under the ambit of CTA’s reporting requirements, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review of such businesses’ corporate and employment structures to ensure full compliance with the CTA. We will discuss the employee prong of the “large operating company” exemption in more detail below, with examples of how an organization’s structure might affect the analysis.