""

Antitrust & Competition

Antitrust & Competition

Antitrust & Competition

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Overview

Our leading Antitrust & Competition practice includes over 75 dedicated lawyers located in 15 offices across the US, UK, Belgium, France and Germany. Our significant global coverage is combined with intimate local knowledge of markets and regulatory regimes. Whether your issue is international or domestic, we will provide the strategic insight necessary to help you manage antitrust and competition law risk and at the same time achieve your commercial objectives. Our team provides commercially-focused, full-service competition and regulatory support to clients, ranging from compliance policies and training to cartel investigations and merger controlThe experience of our team is substantive and diverse – in private practice, in industry, at regulators, in economics and in law. We are well-equipped to offer innovative, efficient and effective solutions. We are continually recognised for our work, and Global Competition Review has named us “one of the world’s leading competition practices”. 

In addition to working with clients dealing with significant domestic and international cartel investigations, we act as trusted advisors to clients on the full spectrum of antitrust issues, including assessments of supply and distribution arrangements and other vertical agreements, horizontal cooperation agreements and monopolization/abuse of dominance questions.  Given the importance of compliance, we help companies devise and implement policies by understanding the risks facing their businesses. Whethere are concerns about conduct, we work with clients to undertake the necessary internal investigations, focussing on identifying and mitigating risk. We also have extensive experience helping clients with queries relating to State aid and public procurement. With years of experience advising clients across regulated sectors, we bring a strategic approach to achieving a successful outcome, and our strength and depth across multiple industries provides clients with exceptional insight into the common themes and challenges facing regulated businesses. 

We help our clients minimise the cost and burden of complying with the multiple systems of merger control that now exist worldwide, and help clients obtain clearance in those jurisdictions where notification is required, in the shortest time and in an efficient and co-ordinated manner. Members of our team have successfully advised on many high profile and complex transactions, including obtaining HSR clearance from the US competition authorities and responding to second requests, as well as Phase II investigations by the European Commission and UK Competition and Markets Authority. Our strong relationships with the US, EU, UK and other competition authorities enable us to navigate the merger control process smoothly, from briefing papers and pre-notification meetings to notifications, oral hearings and, where necessary, negotiated modifications and remedies. We are able rapidly to assess whether and where your transaction may need to be disclosed, and we advise you as to regulatory risk to allow for well-informed decisions that affect the future of your business.  

In the past decade, our award-winning team has been at the forefront of advising clients in disputes concerning alleged anti-competitive conduct, including bringing and defending damages actions and defending class action suits (involving allegations of unlawful agreements, monopolization, and abuse of dominance). Globally, we have acted in many key competition litigation cases. Unlike many practices, we represent a wide range of clients, including both defendants and claimants/plaintiffs. Using our comprehensive knowledge and experience from different standpoints, we stay one step ahead in formulating successful strategies.

Given the current climate of increased antitrust enforcement, a business of any size is likely to receive a third-party subpoena in an agency enforcement investigation, such as those conducted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the Department of Justice (DOJ). When a business receives a third-party subpoena for documents, the first concern is always responding to the subpoena. But that is only the beginning. Once compliance is finished, the main concerns are: who will see my documents? How can I prevent other parties—who may be my closest competitors—from seeing my documents? And how can I protect my confidential documents in a cost-effective way? BCLP has extensive experience responding to third-party subpoenas efficiently and cost-effectively. In particular, we can advise you on:

  • What level of confidentiality to choose in a protective order?
  • Will you be successful in adding further layers of confidentiality?
  • How can you limit the access of parties’ employees to your documents?
  • Will you be able to limit outside counsel’s access to your documents?
  • Is complete inaccessibility by parties’ employees to your documents achievable?
  • How to make sure you know who exactly will see your documents?
  • Will you know if the government wants to use your documents outside of the current lawsuit?
  • How can you obtain notice from the parties if your documents are being used publicly?
  • What will happen to your documents at the end of a lawsuit?

If you have any questions about third-party subpoenas or would like to receive training/guidance on this topic, please contact David B. Schwartz, Ashley Kim or your usual BCLP contact.

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis / Washington

+1 314 259 2412
Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley

Australian Registered Foreign Lawyer (admitted in England and Wales) and Global Practice Group Leader - White Collar, Antitrust, and International Trade, Sydney

+44 20 3400 4630
Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis / Washington

+1 314 259 2412
Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley

Australian Registered Foreign Lawyer (admitted in England and Wales) and Global Practice Group Leader - White Collar, Antitrust, and International Trade, Sydney

+44 20 3400 4630

Meet The Team

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis / Washington

+1 314 259 2412
Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley

Australian Registered Foreign Lawyer (admitted in England and Wales) and Global Practice Group Leader - White Collar, Antitrust, and International Trade, Sydney

+44 20 3400 4630

Related Capabilities

  • Government Contracts & Public Procurement

Related Insights

Insights
Oct 07, 2025

Spotlight on the UK’s NSI regime

It’s been over three years since the UK’s National Security and Investment (NSI) regime came into force. Since then, the regime has remained largely unchanged, with several attempts over the period to increase the transparency and clarity of the regime through the publication of Annual Reports and market guidance notes. On 22 July 2025, the UK Government announced three significant updates to the regime: A 12-week consultation on proposed reforms to the 17 sectors that give rise to mandatory notification; An announcement that certain types of transactions (notably in respect of internal reorganisations) would be removed from the scope of the NSI regime; and The publication of its fourth Annual Report on the operation of the regime. Together with the Government’s Industrial Strategy and National Security Strategy, these updates reflect the Government’s efforts to ensure that the NSI regime keeps apace with growing national security threats while at the same time promoting investment in line with the Government’s broader growth agenda. For investors and corporates active in the UK, these developments are important: they highlight where the focus of the Government is shifting, how the regime is operating in practice and the implications for deal execution. Below we consider the main reforms proposed and the impact for businesses.
News
Oct 01, 2025

The Legal 500 UK 2026

Insights
Sep 30, 2025

Blocking Their Own Shot: FTC’s Recent Arguments Could Impact If and How FTC Investigations Are Conducted

In Media Matters v. Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) suggested that issues surrounding the scope, validity, and enforceability of a civil investigative demand (CID) should be addressed during an enforcement action. This position could have significant implications for the FTC’s ability to conduct investigations due to the public nature of enforcement actions, limited FTC resources, and the potential for an increased number of challenges to the FTC’s authority to start investigations in the first place.

Related Insights

Insights
Oct 07, 2025
Spotlight on the UK’s NSI regime
It’s been over three years since the UK’s National Security and Investment (NSI) regime came into force. Since then, the regime has remained largely unchanged, with several attempts over the period to increase the transparency and clarity of the regime through the publication of Annual Reports and market guidance notes. On 22 July 2025, the UK Government announced three significant updates to the regime: A 12-week consultation on proposed reforms to the 17 sectors that give rise to mandatory notification; An announcement that certain types of transactions (notably in respect of internal reorganisations) would be removed from the scope of the NSI regime; and The publication of its fourth Annual Report on the operation of the regime. Together with the Government’s Industrial Strategy and National Security Strategy, these updates reflect the Government’s efforts to ensure that the NSI regime keeps apace with growing national security threats while at the same time promoting investment in line with the Government’s broader growth agenda. For investors and corporates active in the UK, these developments are important: they highlight where the focus of the Government is shifting, how the regime is operating in practice and the implications for deal execution. Below we consider the main reforms proposed and the impact for businesses.
News
Oct 01, 2025
The Legal 500 UK 2026
Insights
Sep 30, 2025
Blocking Their Own Shot: FTC’s Recent Arguments Could Impact If and How FTC Investigations Are Conducted
In Media Matters v. Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) suggested that issues surrounding the scope, validity, and enforceability of a civil investigative demand (CID) should be addressed during an enforcement action. This position could have significant implications for the FTC’s ability to conduct investigations due to the public nature of enforcement actions, limited FTC resources, and the potential for an increased number of challenges to the FTC’s authority to start investigations in the first place.
News
Sep 26, 2025
BCLP advises Safran Defense and Space on Attollo Engineering acquisition
Insights
Sep 26, 2025
Increased Scrutiny of Crop Inputs: USDA Announcement Signals a Renewed Partnership with DOJ Antitrust Enforcement
News
Sep 23, 2025
BCLP advises Canal+ on acquisition of South African media company MultiChoice
Insights
Sep 17, 2025
Competing for talent: labour markets remain a focus for the CMA
Insights
Sep 10, 2025
Foreign Investment Control in France
News
Sep 08, 2025
BCLP Bolsters International Trade Capabilities with Arrival of DC-Based Partner