We Are Industry Leaders

Practice or Sector
Location
Type
People

Practice or Sector
Location
Type
People

13 Results

India Fahy
Insights
Apr 20, 2023

Mastercard overcharge counterfactual declined – Tribunal rules in Merricks class action

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has handed down a judgment determining several preliminary issues in the £17 billion collective action brought against Mastercard in relation to anti-competitive…
Insights
Apr 17, 2023

Learning from the latest Trucks cartel judgment: a conversation between BCLP and Erso Capital

BCLP has been at the forefront of competition litigation ever since the seminal National Grid Gas Insulated Switch Gear claim issued in 2008. More recently, there has been significant interest in its…
Insights
Mar 28, 2023

Demolished by the CMA – collusion in the demolition industry

On 23 March 2023 the UK Competition and Markets Authority (‘CMA’) issued an announcement that it has issued fines totalling nearly £60m to 10 construction firms for illegally colluding to rig bids for…
Insights
Mar 17, 2023

Financing losses and interest - simple pleasures or compounding the misery?

It has long been a mystery to economists, accountants and business people why lawyers have regard to simple interest in commercial cases, in circumstances where companies generally do not (and cannot)…
Insights
Dec 18, 2020

Merricks v MasterCard: the Supreme Court delivers collective joy to class representatives

The Supreme Court has handed down a landmark judgment in a £14 billion collective action brought against MasterCard in relation to anticompetitive interchange fees, following an infringement decision…
Insights
Nov 11, 2020

Bound by prior admissions: Court of Appeal upholds the CAT’s abuse of process judgment against Truck Cartelists

The Court of Appeal has strongly dismissed an appeal against the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s (“CAT’s”) decision that it would be an abuse of process for certain truck manufacturers to seek to…
This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.