Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Christian Bromley

Christian Bromley
  1. People /

Christian Bromley

Christian Bromley

Partner


Atlanta/Los Angeles
Christian Bromley
  1. People /

Christian Bromley

Christian Bromley

Partner


Atlanta/Los Angeles

Christian Bromley

Partner

Atlanta/Los Angeles

T: +1 404 572 6841

T: +1 310 576 2191

LinkedInLinkedIn
VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

  • Experience

  • Resources

Biography

Christian co-leads the firm’s Toxic Tort Practice, co-chairs the LGBTQ+ Affinity Group for the United States, and co-chairs the Recruiting Committee as hiring partner for the Atlanta office. 

He represents clients in complex commercial disputes and mass tort litigation ranging from consumer claims, product liability, and environmental contamination to a variety of insurance and financial transactions. With bi-coastal residency in the firm’s Atlanta and Los Angeles offices, Christian regularly represents clients before courts and arbitral tribunals in California, Florida, Georgia, and throughout other venues nationwide.

Toxic TORT, PFAS, STATE GOVERNMENT LITIGATION

Christian has dedicated a specific portion of his practice to toxic and environmental tort litigation, and product liability disputes, including complex mass torts, environmental consumer class actions, groundwater contamination disputes, and wastewater treatment litigation.

Christian’s experience spans successful mandamus claims interpreting state environmental rules, suits against government entities and municipalities, and state attorney general investigations. Christian has regularly defended and advised clients in manufacturing and contamination litigation involving PFCs (perfluorochemicals) and PFAS substances (per- and polyfluoroalkyl) since 2016. He has handled various aspects of these disputes, whether jurisdictional challenges in state and federal courts, evidentiary hearings on nuanced preemption and zoning issues, or managing years of complicated fact and expert discovery on complicated scientific questions. 

COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION

Christian advises regional and multi-national corporate clients through all stages of complex commercial litigation with particular experience handling nuanced jurisdictional disputes, cross-board challenges, and complicated discovery matters with numerous interested parties, international entities, and state and federal agencies.

Christian has successfully tried complex commercial contract and tort claims in state courts and in arbitration before the International Centre for Dispute Resolution, as well as multi-day evidentiary hearings and witness examinations.

Christian is also well versed in litigation for banking and financial institution clients involving consumer claims, digital currencies, challenges to servicing relationships for commercial, residential, and student loans, shareholder disputes and receiverships with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Federal Reserve, enforcement of various lending agreements, and alleged violations of consumer laws (the Truth in Lending Act (TILA); the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA); the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA); the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA); and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA)).

STATE & FEDERAL APPEALS

Christian routinely brings and defends appeals on behalf of corporate clients in state and federal courts in California, Florida, and Georgia. These appeals have involved diverse legal issues, such as challenging personal jurisdiction over out-of-state and international entities in California, developing parameters for the interpretation of Georgia insurance contracts, and establishing precedent for the standing of financial services entities to bring foreclosure litigation in Florida.

Christian has also represented the Georgia Chamber of Commerce as an amicus curiae in many proceedings before the Georgia Supreme Court, the Georgia Court of Appeals, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in matters involving tort reform, the interpretation of Georgia’s Civil Practice Act, and jurisdiction over out-of-state corporations registered to do business in Georgia.

PRO-BONO INITIATIVES

Christian has been committed to pro-bono work since joining the firm as a summer associate. He has participated in a number of high-profile pro-bono matters and committed well over 1,000 hours to this work in recent years. These matters include an on-going capital post-conviction proceeding in Louisiana, prominent Voting Rights Act litigation for multiple state and federal elections in 2016, 2018, and 2020, and state and federal constitutional challenges to legislation impacting same-sex couples and families on behalf of Lambda Legal.

The pro-bono litigation teams on which Christian has served in these matters have received awards for their service from both the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and the Stonewall Bar Association of Georgia.

Civic Involvement & Honors

  • Executive Leadership Team, March of Dimes, Atlanta (2025)
  • Bloomberg Law: They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40 (2024)
  • The Best Lawyers in America©: Ones to Watch (2021-2025)
  • Atlanta Bar Association:
    • Member-at-Large, Litigation Section (2023-present)
    • Judicial Selection and Tenure Committee (2023-2025)
    • Community Service Committee, Litigation Section (2021-2022)
  • Leadership Council for Legal Diversity
    • Coaching Circle Co-Chair (2023, 2024)
    • Pathfinder (2020)
  • Human Rights Campaign, Federal Club (2016-Present)
  • Civic Associations
    • 1421 Peachtree (2021-present)
    • Ansley Park (2021-present)
    • Lake Burton (2021-present)
  • Emory University School of Law
    • Emory Law Journal, Managing Editor (2014-2015)
    • Dean’s Award, Intellectual Property (Fall 2013)
    • Dean’s Award, Legal Writing, Research and Advocacy Program (Fall 2012)
  • Rollins College
    • Valedictorian, Class of 2012
    • General Charles McCormick Reeve Award (2012)
    • Brendan O’Sullivan Memorial Award (2012)

Professional Affiliations

  • American Bar Association
  • State Bar of California
  • State Bar of Georgia
  • The Florida Bar
  • Atlanta Bar Association

  • Recruiting Committee (2021- current)
  • Global Associate Council (2021-2023)
  • Los Angeles Branding Committee (2020- current)

Admissions

  • California
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • U.S. District Court for the Central, Eastern, Northern and Southern District of California

    U.S. District Court for the Middle, Northern and Southern District of Florida

    U.S. District Court for the Middle, Northern and Southern District of Georgia

    Supreme Court of California, Florida and Georgia

Education

  • Emory University, J.D., with honors, 2015
  • Rollins College, B.A., summa cum laude, 2012

Related Capabilities

Environmental and Toxic Tort Environmental and Toxic Tort

Class Actions & Mass Torts Class Actions & Mass Torts

Mass Torts & Product Liability Mass Torts & Product Liability

Financial Services Financial Services

Consumer Fraud Consumer Fraud

Insurance (Class Actions) Insurance (Class Actions)

Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions) Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions)

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Consumer Finance Disputes Consumer Finance Disputes

Banking & Finance Disputes Banking & Finance Disputes

Class Actions Class Actions

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Enforcement Enforcement

Litigation Litigation

Regulation Regulation

PFAS PFAS

Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

Regulation, Compliance & Advisory Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

Appellate Appellate

Environmental and Toxic Tort Environmental and Toxic Tort

Class Actions & Mass Torts Class Actions & Mass Torts

Mass Torts & Product Liability Mass Torts & Product Liability

Financial Services Financial Services

Consumer Fraud Consumer Fraud

Insurance (Class Actions) Insurance (Class Actions)

Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions) Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions)

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Consumer Finance Disputes Consumer Finance Disputes

Banking & Finance Disputes Banking & Finance Disputes

Class Actions Class Actions

Business & Commercial Disputes Business & Commercial Disputes

Enforcement Enforcement

Litigation Litigation

Regulation Regulation

PFAS PFAS

Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

Regulation, Compliance & Advisory Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

Appellate Appellate

Environmental and Toxic Tort Environmental and Toxic Tort

  • Class Actions & Mass Torts

  • Mass Torts & Product Liability

  • Financial Services

  • Consumer Fraud

  • Insurance (Class Actions)

  • Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices (Class Actions)

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Consumer Finance Disputes

  • Banking & Finance Disputes

  • Class Actions

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Enforcement

  • Litigation

  • Regulation

  • PFAS

  • Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

  • Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

  • Appellate

  • Environmental and Toxic Tort

Experience

Complex & Class Action Litigation:

  • Represented multiple wearable technology companies in California over breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty claims against competitor resulting in a jury verdict of over $24 million. 
  • Secured dismissal of national waste management provider in proposed Georgia class action asserting breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and related claims associated with alleged failure to provide contracted services.
  • Obtained multi-million dollar judgment for Canada-based technology company following trial of company’s claims before an International Centre for Dispute Resolution tribunal and confirmation before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
  • Defended automotive services company in proposed class action in Florida litigation asserting Florida Telephone Solicitation Act claims.  
  • Obtained judgment for multinational financial services company related to multi-million dollar defaulted loan obligations secured by a Gulfstream business jet aircraft.
  • Resolved breach of contract claims between national payment services provider and multiple financial institutions in California litigation.  
  • Secured dismissal of Japan-based manufacturer from California litigation regarding multi-million dollar dispute over patent rights and patent ownership in the U.S. market.
  • Served as national outside managing counsel for national healthcare information management company’s processing of and appearances for subpoenas.
  • Represented national insurance company in multiple cases alleging bad faith failure to settle underlying claims in Georgia.

Mass Tort & State Government:

  • Defended major industry manufacturer against claims by multiple municipal water supply providers seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages related to alleged use of per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) in Georgia and Alabama.
  • Defended major industry manufacturer in proposed class action alleging damage related to use of per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) in Georgia.
  • Obtained judgment for organic recovery and biofuel company finding certain municipal ordinances to be preempted by the Georgia Soil Amendments Act and in violation of the Georgia Open Meetings Act.   
  • Represented multiple clients in response to Georgia State Attorney General’s Office investigations regarding customer billing practices and other issues.  

State & Federal Appeals:

  • Prosecuted and defended nearly 40 appeals on behalf of financial services institutions and loan servicers before the Georgia Court of Appeals and all of Florida’s District Courts of Appeal.   
  • Secured affirmance of summary judgment on all claims against national insurance company before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit defeating dispute over multi-million dollar life insurance policy.
  • Represented UK-based technology company in petition to California appellate court regarding personal jurisdiction challenge to complaint for damages against company.   
  • Represented the Georgia Chamber of Commerce as an amicus curiae in various proceedings before the Georgia Supreme Court, the Georgia Court of Appeals and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit involving tort reform issues.

Pro-Bono Representation:

  • Christopher Inniss, et al. v. Deborah Aderhold, et al., 1:14-CV-01180-WSD (pro-bono co-counsel to Lambda Legal in challenge to Georgia same-sex marriage ban)
  • Georgia NAACP, et al. v. State of Georgia, et al., No. 1:17cv01427-TCB-WSD-BBM (pro-bono counsel to Georgia NAACP and others)
  • Georgia NAACP, et al. v. Hancock County Board of Elections and Registration, et al., No. 5:15‐cv‐414‐CAR (pro-bono counsel to Georgia NAACP and others)
  • State of Louisiana ex rel. Jimmie C. Duncan v. Tim Hooper, No. 94-F0042 (capital post-conviction pro-bono counsel with The Innocence Project and Mwalimu Center for Justice)

Resources

Publications

  • "Defining Finality: What Constitutes a Final Arbitration Award," ABA Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee, June 2018
  • "Dismissing Provenance: the Use of Procedural Defenses to Bar Claims in Nazi-Looted Art and Securitized Mortgage Litigation," 7 P.R. Bus. L. J. 218 (2016)
  • "Inconsistent as to One, Inconsistent as to All: Sometimes It’s Too Late to Arbitrate,” co-authored with Adwoa Ghartey-Tagoe Seymour, ABA Section of Litigation ADR Newsletter, June 2016
  • “Supremacy and Superiority: the Constitution’s Effect on State Lien Priority Statutes,” 44 Real Estate Law Journal 442 (2016)
  • "Outside Equal Protection: The Evolution of State Laws as Precedent for Lifting Georgia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban," 13 Dartmouth Law Journal 57 (2015)
  • "Encouraging Cooperation: Harmonizing the Battle of Association and Mortgagee Lien Priority in America’s Common Interest Communities," 43 Real Estate Law Journal 255 (2014)

Speaking Engagements

  • Panelist, “Death Penalty Representation: What if the worst crime imaginable never happened?”, Atlanta In-House CLE, March 2025 
  • Moderator, “All Things Experts,” Atlanta Bar Association, March 2025
  • Panelist, “PFAS Update: Due Diligence, Regulatory and Litigation,” 2024 State Bar of Arizona Convention, June 2024

     

  • Speaker, “PFAS: Regulation, Litigation, and Mitigation,” Arizona In-House Counsel CLE, June 2024

  • Speaker, “PFAS: Regulation, Reporting, and Litigation Trends,” Atlanta In-House CLE, March 2024
  • Panelist, “Collaborative Exonerations in Red States,”American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section Annual Fall Institute, November 2023
  • Moderator, “Litigators Serving the Profession, Practice, and Public Series | Business Development for Litigators,” Atlanta Bar Association, October 2023

Related Insights

View All Related InsightsIcon: arrow

Pro Bono
Nov 26, 2025

Jimmie “Chris” Duncan is Released After 27 Years on Louisiana’s Death Row

Insights
Nov 13, 2025

EPA Proposes Significant Exemptions to the TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule

Blog Post
Nov 13, 2025

PFAS in firefighting foam (AFFF) and equipment: state-by-state regulations

Numerous states have either enacted or proposed regulations regarding per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) present in Class B Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (“AFFF”) used for firefighting, or PFAS present in firefighters’ clothing and equipment.  This alert provides a comprehensive state snapshot regarding the status of these regulations across the United States, especially as significant portion of the federal activity involved with firefighting foam involves products used by the Department of Defense (“DOD”). These regulations typically involve restrictions in four general areas:  Discharge or Use Restrictions.  These regulations usually limit or prohibit the use of AFFF in training or testing exercises, and may only allow the use of AFFF in active firefighting situations; Disposal, Storage, Inventory or “Take-back” Provisions.  Some states have enacted state-run programs to purchase and dispose of AFFF, usually purchasing supplies from government agencies; Notification or Reporting Requirements.  When continued use of AFFF is allowed, some states have required that businesses report specific details regarding their discharge; and Limitations on Personal Protective Equipment (“PPE”).  Some states have limited or prohibited PPE for firefighters that contain PFAS compounds. 
Insights
Nov 13, 2025

PFAS in firefighting foam (AFFF) and equipment: state-by-state regulations

Numerous states have either enacted or proposed regulations regarding per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) present in Class B Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (“AFFF”) used for firefighting, or PFAS present in firefighters’ clothing and equipment.  This alert provides a comprehensive state snapshot regarding the status of these regulations across the United States, especially as significant portion of the federal activity involved with firefighting foam involves products used by the Department of Defense (“DOD”). These regulations typically involve restrictions in four general areas:  Discharge or Use Restrictions.  These regulations usually limit or prohibit the use of AFFF in training or testing exercises, and may only allow the use of AFFF in active firefighting situations; Disposal, Storage, Inventory or “Take-back” Provisions.  Some states have enacted state-run programs to purchase and dispose of AFFF, usually purchasing supplies from government agencies; Notification or Reporting Requirements.  When continued use of AFFF is allowed, some states have required that businesses report specific details regarding their discharge; and Limitations on Personal Protective Equipment (“PPE”).  Some states have limited or prohibited PPE for firefighters that contain PFAS compounds. 
Insights
Nov 11, 2025

Georgia Courts Must Follow Federal Standard for Toxic Tort Experts, Appeals Court Rules

Insights
Aug 28, 2025

Tort Reform and Beyond: Key Georgia Legislation Impacting Civil Litigation Since 2022

Since 2022, the Georgia General Assembly has passed several pieces of legislation providing significant impacts for civil litigation and litigants in the State’s courts. Together, the new laws indicate a legislative trend to reform certain practices, or unintentional consequences of judicial application of prior legislation, while also strengthening Georgia’s pro-businesses policies. Examples of the legislation enacted over the past three years include: the Apportionment Statute (O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33) and the codification of the Apex Doctrine (O.C.G.A. § 9-11-26.1) in  response to appellate court decisions, as well as Georgia’s Bad Faith Failure to Settle Statute (O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67.1) and a brand new Tort Reform Package (Senate Bills 68 and 69), which establish additional guardrails around potential claims and liabilities in Georgia. Though the recent 2025 Tort Reform Package represents the legislature’s most comprehensive effort to introduce statutory reform for civil litigation, this package stands with the preceding legislation as a notable backdrop.
Awards
Aug 21, 2025

Best Lawyers in the USA 2026

Insights
May 02, 2025

Georgia Passes Tort Reform Package Signaling Important Shift in Future Litigation

News
Apr 30, 2025

BCLP Partner Christian Bromley Named to Leadership Atlanta Class of 2026

Related Insights

Pro Bono
Nov 26, 2025
Jimmie “Chris” Duncan is Released After 27 Years on Louisiana’s Death Row
Insights
Nov 13, 2025
EPA Proposes Significant Exemptions to the TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule
Blog Post
Nov 13, 2025
PFAS in firefighting foam (AFFF) and equipment: state-by-state regulations
Numerous states have either enacted or proposed regulations regarding per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) present in Class B Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (“AFFF”) used for firefighting, or PFAS present in firefighters’ clothing and equipment.  This alert provides a comprehensive state snapshot regarding the status of these regulations across the United States, especially as significant portion of the federal activity involved with firefighting foam involves products used by the Department of Defense (“DOD”). These regulations typically involve restrictions in four general areas:  Discharge or Use Restrictions.  These regulations usually limit or prohibit the use of AFFF in training or testing exercises, and may only allow the use of AFFF in active firefighting situations; Disposal, Storage, Inventory or “Take-back” Provisions.  Some states have enacted state-run programs to purchase and dispose of AFFF, usually purchasing supplies from government agencies; Notification or Reporting Requirements.  When continued use of AFFF is allowed, some states have required that businesses report specific details regarding their discharge; and Limitations on Personal Protective Equipment (“PPE”).  Some states have limited or prohibited PPE for firefighters that contain PFAS compounds. 
Insights
Nov 13, 2025
PFAS in firefighting foam (AFFF) and equipment: state-by-state regulations
Numerous states have either enacted or proposed regulations regarding per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) present in Class B Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (“AFFF”) used for firefighting, or PFAS present in firefighters’ clothing and equipment.  This alert provides a comprehensive state snapshot regarding the status of these regulations across the United States, especially as significant portion of the federal activity involved with firefighting foam involves products used by the Department of Defense (“DOD”). These regulations typically involve restrictions in four general areas:  Discharge or Use Restrictions.  These regulations usually limit or prohibit the use of AFFF in training or testing exercises, and may only allow the use of AFFF in active firefighting situations; Disposal, Storage, Inventory or “Take-back” Provisions.  Some states have enacted state-run programs to purchase and dispose of AFFF, usually purchasing supplies from government agencies; Notification or Reporting Requirements.  When continued use of AFFF is allowed, some states have required that businesses report specific details regarding their discharge; and Limitations on Personal Protective Equipment (“PPE”).  Some states have limited or prohibited PPE for firefighters that contain PFAS compounds. 
Insights
Nov 11, 2025
Georgia Courts Must Follow Federal Standard for Toxic Tort Experts, Appeals Court Rules
Insights
Aug 28, 2025
Tort Reform and Beyond: Key Georgia Legislation Impacting Civil Litigation Since 2022
Since 2022, the Georgia General Assembly has passed several pieces of legislation providing significant impacts for civil litigation and litigants in the State’s courts. Together, the new laws indicate a legislative trend to reform certain practices, or unintentional consequences of judicial application of prior legislation, while also strengthening Georgia’s pro-businesses policies. Examples of the legislation enacted over the past three years include: the Apportionment Statute (O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33) and the codification of the Apex Doctrine (O.C.G.A. § 9-11-26.1) in  response to appellate court decisions, as well as Georgia’s Bad Faith Failure to Settle Statute (O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67.1) and a brand new Tort Reform Package (Senate Bills 68 and 69), which establish additional guardrails around potential claims and liabilities in Georgia. Though the recent 2025 Tort Reform Package represents the legislature’s most comprehensive effort to introduce statutory reform for civil litigation, this package stands with the preceding legislation as a notable backdrop.
Awards
Aug 21, 2025
Best Lawyers in the USA 2026
Insights
May 02, 2025
Georgia Passes Tort Reform Package Signaling Important Shift in Future Litigation
News
Apr 30, 2025
BCLP Partner Christian Bromley Named to Leadership Atlanta Class of 2026
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP