Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Cory G. Smith

Cory Smith
  1. People /

Cory G. Smith

Cory G. Smith

Partner


Phoenix
Cory Smith
  1. People /

Cory G. Smith

Cory G. Smith

Partner


Phoenix

Cory G. Smith

Partner

Phoenix

T: +1 602 364 7442

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

  • Resources

Biography

Cory Smith is a registered patent attorney whose practice focuses on intellectual property law and technology transactions, with an emphasis on computer-related technologies. He has extensive experience in patent preparation and prosecution, patent litigation and pre-litigation, post-grant proceedings, patent analysis and counseling (including tear-down, freedom-to-operate, invalidity, and infringement opinions), trademark preparation and prosecution, trademark counseling, trademark disputes, copyright preparation and prosecution, and copyright disputes. He is also considered a thought leader on the intersection of patent and artificial intelligence issues.

Cory regularly handles patent matters in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions in many areas of technology, including computer software, computer hardware, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, cryptography, computer networking, data communications, robotics, electronics, sensing systems, imaging, simulators, data science applications, machine learning and large language models, block chain, cybersecurity, virtual reality, payment services, financial technology, agricultural technology, e-commerce technology, mobile applications, business applications, business methods, mechanical devices, construction materials, sports equipment, toys, and consumer goods.

He has handled many technology transactions, including negotiating software acquisitions and licenses, handling intellectual property and software aspects of mergers, acquisitions, and other corporate transactions, and performing due diligence. Cory also has extensive experience handling open source software issues. Additionally, he has handled various pro bono matters, including assisting nonprofits with intellectual property issues and representing low-income parents in severance and adoption proceedings.

Cory has a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering. His technical experience includes a position as an engineer at IBM, where he designed and developed data storage systems.

Prior to joining the firm, Cory served as a law clerk for the Honorable A. John Pelander at the Arizona Supreme Court. During law school, he served as managing editor of the Arizona Law Review and as secretary of the J. Reuben Clark Law Society. Cory also served as an extern for the Honorable Paul E. Tang of the Pima County Superior Court.

Civic Involvement & Honors

  • Best Lawyers in America: Ones to Watch, Patent Law, 2024 - 2025
  • DeConcini, McDonald, Yetwin & Lacy Academic Achievement Award

Admissions

  • Arizona, 2011
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • United States District Court for the District of Arizona

    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Education

  • The University of Arizona, J.D., summa cum laude, 2011
  • The University of Arizona, B.S., summa cum laude, 2004

Related Capabilities

Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

Litigation & Dispute Resolution Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Regulation, Compliance & Advisory Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

Trademark Prosecution, Counseling & Protection Services Trademark Prosecution, Counseling & Protection Services

AdTech AdTech

PropTech PropTech

Patents: Counseling, Prosecution & Practical Business Services Patents: Counseling, Prosecution & Practical Business Services

Patents: Litigation Patents: Litigation

  • Intellectual Property & Technology Disputes

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

  • Trademark Prosecution, Counseling & Protection Services

  • AdTech

  • PropTech

  • Patents: Counseling, Prosecution & Practical Business Services

  • Patents: Litigation

Resources

Publications

  • "Patent Strategy Tips from Fed. Cir. 'Kroy v. Groupon' Ruling on Collateral Estoppel," IP Strategist/Law.com, April 30 and May 22, 2025
  • "Federal Circuit ruling further narrows the printed matter doctrine," The Patent Lawyer, 2025
  • "Rejoinder Strategy After Allergan Double-Patenting Case," Law360, January 7, 2025
  • "Fed. Circ. Ruling Shows Difficulty Of Proving Deceptive Intent," Law360, May 2024
  • "6 Joint-Inventorship Lessons From Fed. Circ.'s Hormel Ruling," Law360, August 3, 2023
  • "Fed. Circ. Light Case Illuminates Scope of IP Claim Language," Law360, June 5, 2023
  • "What Really Doomed Kidney Test Patents in Fed. Circ. Ruling," Law360, December 16, 2022
  • "Duty of Candor and Good Faith with the USPTO Covers Non-Inventors and Non-Practitioners," Law.com, October 2022
  • "Fed. Circ. Ruling Instructive on Defeating Patent Obviousness," Law360, October 13, 2022
  • "Tips for Experimental-Use Agreements to Avoid On-Sale Bar," Law360, September 14, 2022
  • "Fed. Circ. Acne Drug IP Holding Clarifies Obviousness Factors," Law360, May 24, 2022
  • "Reckless Disregard for the Truth of a Material Statement Made to the USPTO is Sufficient for Proving the Intent to Deceive," Law.com, January 2022

Related Insights

View All Related InsightsIcon: arrow

News
Aug 15, 2025

Tips on Drafting Machine Learning Patents: Mojdeh Farsi, George Chen and Cory Smith Published in Law360

Insights
Jun 11, 2025

Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Prosecution Disclaimer in Patent Families

In Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc., 131 F.4th 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2025), the Federal Circuit addressed whether the prosecution history of one patent in a patent family can limit the scope of claims in a different patent in that same patent family, when the claim terms in the two patents are similar but not the same.
News
Jan 15, 2025

BCLP advises Vantiva in the sale of its Supply Chain Solutions business to Variant Equity Advisors

News
Jan 14, 2025

Breaking Down Allergan’s Double-Patenting Case: Insights from Brandon Stephens, George Chen, and Cory Smith in Law360

News
Jan 14, 2025

Rethinking Patent Doctrine in Tech: Peter Gao, George Chen, and Cory Smith Published in The Patent Lawyer 2025

News
May 10, 2024

Court ruling highlights challenges in proving inequitable conduct for revived patents

News
Mar 19, 2024

Tips on numerical range from Fed. Circ. Philip Morris ruling

Insights
Oct 24, 2023

Lawyers co-author article in 'Law360' on patent reissuance options

Awards
Aug 17, 2023

The Best Lawyers in America® 2024

Related Insights

News
Aug 15, 2025
Tips on Drafting Machine Learning Patents: Mojdeh Farsi, George Chen and Cory Smith Published in Law360
Insights
Jun 11, 2025
Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Prosecution Disclaimer in Patent Families
In Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc., 131 F.4th 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2025), the Federal Circuit addressed whether the prosecution history of one patent in a patent family can limit the scope of claims in a different patent in that same patent family, when the claim terms in the two patents are similar but not the same.
News
Jan 15, 2025
BCLP advises Vantiva in the sale of its Supply Chain Solutions business to Variant Equity Advisors
News
Jan 14, 2025
Breaking Down Allergan’s Double-Patenting Case: Insights from Brandon Stephens, George Chen, and Cory Smith in Law360
News
Jan 14, 2025
Rethinking Patent Doctrine in Tech: Peter Gao, George Chen, and Cory Smith Published in The Patent Lawyer 2025
News
May 10, 2024
Court ruling highlights challenges in proving inequitable conduct for revived patents
News
Mar 19, 2024
Tips on numerical range from Fed. Circ. Philip Morris ruling
Insights
Oct 24, 2023
Lawyers co-author article in 'Law360' on patent reissuance options
Awards
Aug 17, 2023
The Best Lawyers in America® 2024
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP