Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
BCLP logo
  • People People

  • SectorsAviation, Aerospace & DefenseEnergy TransitionFinancial InstitutionsFood & AgribusinessHealthcare & Life SciencesReal EstateRetail & Consumer Products Sports, Media & Entertainment

    View all sectors View all sectors

    Practice areasFinanceInvestigationsLitigationReal EstateRegulation, Compliance & AdvisoryTax & Private ClientTransactions

    View all practice areas View all practice areas

  • News News

    AwardsDiversityPro Bono

    View all News View all News

    Insights Insights

    BlogsPodcastsWebinars

    View all Insights View all Insights

  • Perspectives Perspectives

    Getting Deals DoneEmerging Themes 2025The Sustainability Imperative Confronting CorruptionClass Actions
    Trending TopicsArtificial IntelligenceThe Corporate Transparency ActTrump Second Term: Legal Tracker
  • Events Events

    Webinars
  • About us About us

    Pro bono & CommunityInclusion & DiversityResponsible Business

    Client stories Client stories

    Media inquiries Media inquiries

  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Subscribe
BCLP logo
People
Capabilities
News & Insights
BCLP logo

Karen W. Fries

Karen Fries
  1. People /

Karen W. Fries

Karen W. Fries

Partner


St. Louis
Karen Fries
  1. People /

Karen W. Fries

Karen W. Fries

Partner


St. Louis

Karen W. Fries

Partner

St. Louis

Partner and Global Practice Group Leader - Finance Transactions

T: +1 314 259 2635

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share
  • Biography

  • Experience

Biography

Karen Fries is the Global Leader of BCLP's Finance Transactions practice group, which represents banks and other financial services entities as well as borrowers and issuers of debt throughout the U.S., U.K., France and Germany. Karen is also a member of BCLP’s Global Board.

Karen practices primarily in the area of borrower representation in connection with a wide variety of finance transactions. She represents a number of public and private corporations. Her experience includes negotiation and documentation of secured and unsecured, syndicated and single-lender revolving credit and term loan facilities as well as receivables sale and securitizations transactions. She has also represented borrowers in private placements. Karen also represents lenders in middle market bilateral credit facility transactions.  She also has broad restructuring experience including negotiation and documentation of large, syndicated debtor in possession financing transactions, representation of secured and unsecured creditors in various aspects of Chapter 11 cases and negotiation and documentation of out-of-court restructuring transactions.

Karen received a J.D. from Vanderbilt University School of Law in 1989. She was a member of the Vanderbilt Law Review and the Vanderbilt Chapter of the Order of the Coif. Karen graduated, cum laude, from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio in 1986 with a B.S. in Business.

Civic Involvement & Honors

  • The Best Lawyers in America, Banking and Finance Law (2016-2024)

Admissions

  • Illinois, 1990
  • Missouri, 1989

Education

Vanderbilt University, J.D., Order of the Coif, 1989

Miami University, B.S., cum laude, 1986

Related Capabilities

Corporate Corporate

Finance Finance

Structured Finance Structured Finance

Private Equity Private Equity

ESOP ESOP

Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure

ERISA & ESOP ERISA & ESOP

Structured Products & Derivatives Structured Products & Derivatives

Debt Capital Markets Debt Capital Markets

Portfolio Sales Portfolio Sales

Servicing Servicing

Restructuring & Insolvency/Special Situations Restructuring & Insolvency/Special Situations

Funds Finance Funds Finance

Securitizations (RMBS) Securitizations (RMBS)

Financial Institutions Financial Institutions

Corporate Corporate

Finance Finance

Structured Finance Structured Finance

Private Equity Private Equity

ESOP ESOP

Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure

ERISA & ESOP ERISA & ESOP

Structured Products & Derivatives Structured Products & Derivatives

Debt Capital Markets Debt Capital Markets

Portfolio Sales Portfolio Sales

Servicing Servicing

Restructuring & Insolvency/Special Situations Restructuring & Insolvency/Special Situations

Funds Finance Funds Finance

Securitizations (RMBS) Securitizations (RMBS)

Financial Institutions Financial Institutions

Corporate Corporate

Finance Finance

Structured Finance Structured Finance

Private Equity Private Equity

ESOP ESOP

Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure

  • ERISA & ESOP

  • Structured Products & Derivatives

  • Debt Capital Markets

  • Portfolio Sales

  • Servicing

  • Restructuring & Insolvency/Special Situations

  • Funds Finance

  • Securitizations (RMBS)

  • Financial Institutions

  • Corporate

  • Finance

  • Structured Finance

  • Private Equity

  • ESOP

  • Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure

Experience

Following is a sample of significant engagements:

  • Counsel for administrative agent in connection with $200 million revolving credit agreement for debtor in possession financing
  • Counsel for multi-national borrowers in connection with $605 million secured revolving credit and term loan agreement
  • Counsel for multi-national borrowers in connection with $550 million revolving unsecured revolving credit agreement
  • Counsel for borrower in connection with $100 million secured revolving credit agreement.
  • Counsel for multi-national borrowers in connection with $1 billion secured revolving credit and inventory floorplan financing agreement
  • Counsel for administrative agent in connection with $52 million secured revolving credit, equipment line of credit and term loan agreement (including negotiation of intercreditor and subordination agreements with subordinated debt holders)
  • Counsel for major supplier to distressed manufacturing company in connection with pre-bankruptcy restructuring, negotiation of creditor protections in connection with debtor in possession financing provided by new investor and in connection with negotiation of plan of reorganization and related exit financing
  • Counsel for multi-national borrowers in connection with $450 million revolving credit agreement
  • Counsel to borrower in connection with $850 million revolving credit agreement
  • Counsel to borrower in connection with revolving credit, term and subordinated financing for sale of closely-held business to an employee stock ownership trust
  • Counsel to sellers in connection with multiple purchase agreements for the sale of accounts receivable
  • Issuance (for borrowers) and review (for lenders) of bankruptcy-related opinions (substantive consolidation and true sale) in connection with complex financing transactions

Related Insights

View All Related InsightsIcon: arrow

Awards
Aug 21, 2025

Best Lawyers in the USA 2026

Awards
Aug 17, 2023

The Best Lawyers in America® 2024

News
Jan 26, 2023

BCLP advises Capacity in acquisition of Textel CX Inc.

News
Jan 23, 2023

BCLP advises Benson Hill on divestiture of its fresh foods segment

Insights
Jan 06, 2023

BCLP Israel Deal Round-up 2022

Insights
Aug 24, 2022

Deceptive and unfair -- multiple NSF fees on representments of the same transaction

In guidance issued recently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) advised that charging multiple non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fees constitute “violations of law” when customer disclosures do not fully and clearly explain that the same unpaid transaction might result in multiple NSF fees if an item is presented more than once.[1] Supervisory Guidance on Multiple Re-Presentment NSF Fees, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Financial Institutions Letter, August 18, 2022.
Insights
Aug 19, 2022

CFPB guidance on pay-to-pay fees impacts consumer loan agreements

Consumer debt collectors may not be permitted to charge consumers “convenience fees” for card payments, which the Consumer Financial Protection Board (the “CFPB”) calls “pay-to-pay” fees, unless the underlying loan agreement expressly provides that such fees may be charged. Such language may also lessen exposure to UDAAP enforcement. Consumer lenders may want to review their loan agreements as a result of a recent Advisory Opinion[1] issued by the CFPB and determine whether additional language would enhance the ability of debt collectors to charge convenience fees for card payments. Debt collectors may want to determine whether the existing loan agreements they are seeking to enforce are sufficiently worded to support charging convenience fees to consumer debtors from whom they collecting payments on defaulted loans.
Awards
Aug 18, 2022

The Best Lawyers in America© 2023

Awards
Aug 19, 2021

The Best Lawyers in America© 2022

Related Insights

Awards
Aug 21, 2025
Best Lawyers in the USA 2026
Awards
Aug 17, 2023
The Best Lawyers in America® 2024
News
Jan 26, 2023
BCLP advises Capacity in acquisition of Textel CX Inc.
News
Jan 23, 2023
BCLP advises Benson Hill on divestiture of its fresh foods segment
Insights
Jan 06, 2023
BCLP Israel Deal Round-up 2022
Insights
Aug 24, 2022
Deceptive and unfair -- multiple NSF fees on representments of the same transaction
In guidance issued recently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) advised that charging multiple non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fees constitute “violations of law” when customer disclosures do not fully and clearly explain that the same unpaid transaction might result in multiple NSF fees if an item is presented more than once.[1] Supervisory Guidance on Multiple Re-Presentment NSF Fees, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Financial Institutions Letter, August 18, 2022.
Insights
Aug 19, 2022
CFPB guidance on pay-to-pay fees impacts consumer loan agreements
Consumer debt collectors may not be permitted to charge consumers “convenience fees” for card payments, which the Consumer Financial Protection Board (the “CFPB”) calls “pay-to-pay” fees, unless the underlying loan agreement expressly provides that such fees may be charged. Such language may also lessen exposure to UDAAP enforcement. Consumer lenders may want to review their loan agreements as a result of a recent Advisory Opinion[1] issued by the CFPB and determine whether additional language would enhance the ability of debt collectors to charge convenience fees for card payments. Debt collectors may want to determine whether the existing loan agreements they are seeking to enforce are sufficiently worded to support charging convenience fees to consumer debtors from whom they collecting payments on defaulted loans.
Awards
Aug 18, 2022
The Best Lawyers in America© 2023
Awards
Aug 19, 2021
The Best Lawyers in America© 2022
Icon: arrow

Back to top

BCLP logo
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Practice Areas
  • Sectors
  • News & Insights
  • Awards
  • Blogs
  • News & Events
  • Insights
  • Webinars
  • Perspectives
  • Getting Deals Done
  • Emerging Themes
  • The Sustainability Imperative
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Locations
    • Subscribe
    • Legal notices
    • Privacy notice
    • Modern Slavery Act
    • Cookie policy
    • UK Transparency Rules
    • Media inquiries
    Icon: linkedin

    © 2025 Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP