Roman Khodykin

  1. People /

Roman Khodykin

Roman Khodykin

Partner

  1. People /

Roman Khodykin

Roman Khodykin

Partner

Roman Khodykin

Partner

London

T: +44 (0) 20 3400 2202

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Biography

Roman is an arbitration specialist with extensive experience in national and cross-border matters, with particular emphasis on shareholder and energy disputes. He holds a Ph. D in Conflict of Laws. In recent years Roman has acted in ICSID, LCIA, DIFC, ICC, AAA and MKAS arbitrations. Roman also represented athletes before the Ad Hoc Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Tremendously hard working and goal-oriented, he delivers the best possible service at all times

Legal 500

Roman is dual qualified as a Solicitor Advocate in England and Wales and a Russian advocate.  He also has higher rights in the AIFC Court in Kazakhstan.

For several years running, Roman has been highly recommended as one of the leading international arbitration lawyers by Chambers & Partners and The Legal 500 Guides. He is also recognised by peers in the Best Lawyers 2019 Edition in Arbitration and Mediation, International Arbitration and Litigation.

Clients describe Roman as “commercially focused, the go-to person in London when a case has a Russian aspect” (Chambers Europe) and “tremendously hard working and goal-oriented, he delivers the best possible service at all times” (The Legal 500).

He also regularly writes on the subject of arbitration.  Publications include:

  • “A Guide to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration”(Oxford University Press, 2019).
  • “Arbitration Law of Russia: Practice and Procedure” (JurisPublishing, New York, 2013).
  • Chapter on Documentary Evidence in:  Handbook of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration Key Issues and Concepts, ed. by Franco Ferrari and Friedrich Rosenfield (Kluwer Law International B.V. 2022)
  • Chapter on Witness Evidence in:  International Arbitration in England Perspectives in Times of Change, ed. by Gregory Fullelove, Laila Hamzi and Daniel Harrison (Kluwer Law International B.V. 2022)
  • 'Interaction between Russia and England in Civil Procedure' (2014) 25 European Business Law Review, Issue 4, pp. 499–516.
  • “Arbitration in Russia: Hot Topic in a Cold Winter” in: Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation. Fordham Papers 2011 / Ed. by A. Rovine (Leiden-Boston 2012).
  • "Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators in Investment Disputes" in: "Arbitration", 2011, issue 4.
  • Chapter on the Russian Federation Law on International Commercial Arbitration in:"World Arbitration Reporter", ed. by Loukas Mistelis, Laurence Shore and Hans Smit (2010);
  • "Application of New Provisions of the Arbitrazh Procedure Code on Class Action" in:"The Herald of the Urals District Federal Arbitrazh Court", 2010, issue 1, pp. 132-143;
  • "Observations on the Draft Amendments to Section VI, Private International Law, of the Russian Federation Civil Code" in: "Journal of Private International Law", 2011, issue 1.”

Roman is a Visiting Professor in the Centre for Commercial Law at Queen Mary University of London. He has also lectured at Clare College, Cambridge University, l’Université Paris-Saclay (Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin) and Exeter University. 

Additionally, in 2015-2018  Roman was an alternative member of the ICC Court of International Arbitration in Paris. 

The Growth of Class Actions: What’s next?

Admissions

  • England and Wales
  • Russian Federation

Related Practice Areas

  • International Arbitration

  • Insurance

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Energy & Natural Resources

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • UK & EU Class Actions

  • Oil, Gas and LNG

  • Insurance Regulatory

  • Insurance: Corporate & Transactional

  • Insurance Insolvency & Receiverships

  • Sports & Entertainment

  • Collegiate Sports Practice

  • Olympic & National Governing Body Practice

  • Professional Sports Team Practice

  • Captive Insurance

  • Sports & Entertainment Contract, Endorsement & Celebrity Representation Practice

  • Anti-Doping Practice

  • Sports & Event Venue Real Estate Infrastructure and Operation

  • Naming Rights & Sponsorship Practice

  • Sports & Entertainment M&A Practice

  • Sports & Entertainment Litigation Practice

  • Sports & Entertainment Specialty Counseling Practice

  • Entertainment Industry Practice

  • Sports & Event Financing

  • InsureTech

  • Insurance (Class Actions)

Related Insights

News
Feb 20, 2024

Chambers Global 2024

Insights
Feb 13, 2024

English Court decides Covid-19 is a “catastrophe”

The English Court has, for the first time, considered the meaning of a “catastrophe”, as well as how Hours Clauses work in the context of non-damage business interruption losses claimed under two Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaties.  While the Covid-19 pandemic may feel like a distant memory to some, disputes about the recovery of Covid-19 losses continue to trouble many reinsureds and reinsurers.  The two key issues considered by the Commercial Court in determining appeals from arbitration awards made in Unipol Re v Covéa and Markel v Gen Re may bring welcome, and valuable, guidance to those in the reinsurance industry debating these terms. Those underwriting or purchasing “catastrophe” covers may also want to carefully consider this judgment and whether the Court’s approach to the meaning of that word aligns with their coverage expectations.
News
Feb 16, 2023

Chambers Global 2023

Insights
Nov 02, 2022

MUR Shipping Revisited: When force majeure and reasonable endeavours collide

In MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd the English Court of Appeal has overturned by majority the judgment of the Commercial Court in MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd [2022] EWHC 467 (Comm) and provided fresh guidance on when alternative performance can be required as a reasonable endeavours obligation in circumstances of a force majeure event created by sanctions.

Related Insights

News
Feb 20, 2024
Chambers Global 2024
Insights
Feb 13, 2024
English Court decides Covid-19 is a “catastrophe”
The English Court has, for the first time, considered the meaning of a “catastrophe”, as well as how Hours Clauses work in the context of non-damage business interruption losses claimed under two Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaties.  While the Covid-19 pandemic may feel like a distant memory to some, disputes about the recovery of Covid-19 losses continue to trouble many reinsureds and reinsurers.  The two key issues considered by the Commercial Court in determining appeals from arbitration awards made in Unipol Re v Covéa and Markel v Gen Re may bring welcome, and valuable, guidance to those in the reinsurance industry debating these terms. Those underwriting or purchasing “catastrophe” covers may also want to carefully consider this judgment and whether the Court’s approach to the meaning of that word aligns with their coverage expectations.
News
Oct 19, 2023
Chambers UK Ranks BCLP in 41 practice areas and recognizes 74 lawyers
Awards
Oct 04, 2023
The Legal 500 UK ranks BCLP in 54 practice areas and recognizes 74 lawyers as “leading individuals”
News
Jun 01, 2023
BCLP acts in the largest case in history of Astana International Financial Centre Court
News
Feb 17, 2023
BCLP event with one of England’s most influential jurists featured by ‘GAR’
News
Feb 16, 2023
Chambers Global 2023
News
Nov 09, 2022
Lawyers author chapter in ‘International Arbitration in England’
Insights
Nov 02, 2022
MUR Shipping Revisited: When force majeure and reasonable endeavours collide
In MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd the English Court of Appeal has overturned by majority the judgment of the Commercial Court in MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd [2022] EWHC 467 (Comm) and provided fresh guidance on when alternative performance can be required as a reasonable endeavours obligation in circumstances of a force majeure event created by sanctions.