Home
Trending topics
Client Stories
News & Insights
Insights
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
Special administration, special measures or a university “supplier of last resort”?
In Part 1, What Happens If a UK University Fails?, Richard Obank explored why mounting financial pressures mean university failure can no longer be dismissed as a theoretical risk. In Part 2, University Insolvency: Why Existing Restructuring Tools Are Not Enough, he examined the gaps in the current legal framework and considered whether the further education sector offers a potential model for reform.
The final instalment considers the case for and against a special administration regime for higher education institutions. It then looks beyond conventional insolvency law to the graduated intervention model used in the NHS and the supplier-of-last-resort mechanism used in the energy sector, before setting out the case for an early-warning framework, regulatory intervention and a credible last-resort process.
Insights
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
UK payment services regulation: at a crossroads
Insights
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Ofgem proposes new commitment fee to tackle battery storage queue oversubscription
Blog Post
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
SEC proposes to rescind rule 14a-8 and streamline proxy solicitation procedural requirements
Insights
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
Approaching green claims: what the Green Transition Directive means for you
News
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
BCLP wins five awards at the 22nd Annual International Tax Review Awards 2026
Awards
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
Partner Saurish Appleby-Bhattacharjee Named to Law Bulletin Media's 40 Under Forty Class of 2026
Insights
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
The CATO Licence - starting as we mean to go on: volume 7
Insights
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 17, 2026
Redundancy or Workforce Replacement? The Hidden Trap in the ERA That Could Catch Every Restructure
The fire and rehire provisions in the Employment Rights Act have had less focus than some of the more headline grabbing changes. However, they do represent a big change for employers. Getting even less attention, tucked alongside the key provisions on varying terms is a further reform, a provision that creates a separate category of automatically unfair dismissal where an employer dismisses an employee in order to have their work done by a non-employee. It is aimed at preventing employers from dressing up workforce replacement as redundancy. But is the ambit of this provision wider than intended?